OK, good start. It should have a noticeable reduction in the number of lines in our examples.
-Alex On 1/3/17, 12:24 PM, "Peter Ent" <p...@adobe.com> wrote: >I've pushed an initial set of classes for this Express project. I did not >hook it up to the main build of flex-asjs yet but you should be able to >build it from the project itself. > >I basically extended the standard HTML classes and added some default >beads. > >—peter > >On 1/3/17, 3:11 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" ><carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> >wrote: > >>I think name should came after we have something with a bit of face that >>could inspire us, for the meantime I'll go a codename route with whatever >>name. >> >>2017-01-03 21:07 GMT+01:00 Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com>: >> >>> I like Express too! >>> >>> - Josh >>> >>> On Jan 3, 2017 10:31 AM, "Peter Ent" <p...@adobe.com> wrote: >>> >>> > I think "Express" isn't a bad name for this. It implies that you can >>>get >>> > something running quickly. >>> > >>> > Another name I thought of was "Star" (FlexJS Star). >>> > >>> > A third choice might be "Prime", meaning the main one to use. >>> > >>> > ‹peter >>> > >>> > On 1/3/17, 12:14 PM, "Dev LFM" <developer...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > >I've been listening this thread, sorry my intrusion.. >>> > > >>> > >Why not simply: >>> > > >>> > >- ComponentBase for the current set without beads, and "Component" >>>for >>> the >>> > >ones with default beads included? >>> > > >>> > >I like "Express" too but not making much sense to me. >>> > > >>> > >My 2 cents ^^ >>> > > >>> > >2017-01-03 16:53 GMT+00:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>: >>> > > >>> > >> Hi, >>> > >> >>> > >> The original thread is another example of where PAYG becomes PITA. >>> On >>> > >> another thread, Om wants to bake in HTML sanitization by default. >>> IMO, >>> > >> these are things that should go in a heavier component set with >>>more >>> > >> things baked in. IMO, this new, heavier component set would be >>>the >>> > >> default for FlexJS. No more forgetting to add DataBinding beads, >>>or >>> > >> SimpleCSSValuesImpl, etc. Fewer tags to write. >>> > >> >>> > >> I've asked Peter to start on it so you can see how to bake stuff >>>in >>> and >>> > >> how much simpler it will make our examples. I think it will help >>>in >>> > >> getting folks started with fewer problems. I think we've proven >>>that >>> we >>> > >> can composite basic things into more complex things. >>> > >> >>> > >> But, we need a good name for this set. I don't like "Heavy". >>>Makes >>> me >>> > >> think it would be too fat and slow. I've ruled out for now >>>"Kitchen >>> > >> Sink", and "Full" (because it won't contain every bead). I've >>>thought >>> > >> about "Medium", "Typical", "Common", "Popular", "POC" (Proof of >>> > >>Concept)", >>> > >> "RP" (Rapid Prototyping). Don't like any of them. What name >>>would >>> > >> suggest that it is not on the place to start but that you could >>>use it >>> > >>in >>> > >> production if you don't run into size/performance issues? >>> > >> >>> > >> Thoughts? >>> > >> -Alex >>> > >> >>> > >> On 1/2/17, 11:20 PM, "piotrz" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >> >Alex, >>> > >> > >>> > >> >That's what I'm missing. It's a bit better cause when I add bead >>> > >> >"ItemRendererDataBinding" my getter has been fired, although >>>binding >>> is >>> > >> >still not working. I've just pushed my code. - Not sure what can >>>be >>> > >> >wrong. >>> > >> > >>> > >> >I have to admit I'm still thinking to much Flex instead of FlexJS >>>:) >>> > >> > >>> > >> >Piotr >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> >----- >>> > >> >Apache Flex PMC >>> > >> >piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >>> > >> >-- >>> > >> >View this message in context: >>> > >> >http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble. >>> > >> com/FlexJS-MDL-Why-bindin >>> > >> >g-is-not-working-in-MDL-example-tp57738p57795.html >>> > >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at >>> > >>Nabble.com. >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >>> > >>> >> >> >> >>-- >> >>Carlos Rovira >>Director General >>M: +34 607 22 60 05 >>http://www.codeoscopic.com >>http://www.avant2.es >> >>Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener >>información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por >>error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía >>y >>proceda a su destrucción. >> >>De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le >>comunicamos >>que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC >>S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del >>servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, >>rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a >>nuestras >>oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación >>necesaria. >
