I think name should came after we have something with a bit of face that could inspire us, for the meantime I'll go a codename route with whatever name.
2017-01-03 21:07 GMT+01:00 Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com>: > I like Express too! > > - Josh > > On Jan 3, 2017 10:31 AM, "Peter Ent" <p...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > I think "Express" isn't a bad name for this. It implies that you can get > > something running quickly. > > > > Another name I thought of was "Star" (FlexJS Star). > > > > A third choice might be "Prime", meaning the main one to use. > > > > ‹peter > > > > On 1/3/17, 12:14 PM, "Dev LFM" <developer...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >I've been listening this thread, sorry my intrusion.. > > > > > >Why not simply: > > > > > >- ComponentBase for the current set without beads, and "Component" for > the > > >ones with default beads included? > > > > > >I like "Express" too but not making much sense to me. > > > > > >My 2 cents ^^ > > > > > >2017-01-03 16:53 GMT+00:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>: > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> The original thread is another example of where PAYG becomes PITA. On > > >> another thread, Om wants to bake in HTML sanitization by default. > IMO, > > >> these are things that should go in a heavier component set with more > > >> things baked in. IMO, this new, heavier component set would be the > > >> default for FlexJS. No more forgetting to add DataBinding beads, or > > >> SimpleCSSValuesImpl, etc. Fewer tags to write. > > >> > > >> I've asked Peter to start on it so you can see how to bake stuff in > and > > >> how much simpler it will make our examples. I think it will help in > > >> getting folks started with fewer problems. I think we've proven that > we > > >> can composite basic things into more complex things. > > >> > > >> But, we need a good name for this set. I don't like "Heavy". Makes > me > > >> think it would be too fat and slow. I've ruled out for now "Kitchen > > >> Sink", and "Full" (because it won't contain every bead). I've thought > > >> about "Medium", "Typical", "Common", "Popular", "POC" (Proof of > > >>Concept)", > > >> "RP" (Rapid Prototyping). Don't like any of them. What name would > > >> suggest that it is not on the place to start but that you could use it > > >>in > > >> production if you don't run into size/performance issues? > > >> > > >> Thoughts? > > >> -Alex > > >> > > >> On 1/2/17, 11:20 PM, "piotrz" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> >Alex, > > >> > > > >> >That's what I'm missing. It's a bit better cause when I add bead > > >> >"ItemRendererDataBinding" my getter has been fired, although binding > is > > >> >still not working. I've just pushed my code. - Not sure what can be > > >> >wrong. > > >> > > > >> >I have to admit I'm still thinking to much Flex instead of FlexJS :) > > >> > > > >> >Piotr > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >----- > > >> >Apache Flex PMC > > >> >piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > > >> >-- > > >> >View this message in context: > > >> >http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble. > > >> com/FlexJS-MDL-Why-bindin > > >> >g-is-not-working-in-MDL-example-tp57738p57795.html > > >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at > > >>Nabble.com. > > >> > > >> > > > > > -- Carlos Rovira Director General M: +34 607 22 60 05 http://www.codeoscopic.com http://www.avant2.es Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación necesaria.
