btw I added an extra case to the if chain in the css code in a recent
commit. It was to cover an rgba variation in DatabindingExample_Flat iirc.
But I don't think it processes the alpha part of the rgba anywhere... I
added todo: comments for this, but I am not sure how important it might be



On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Greg Dove <greg.d...@gmail.com> wrote:

> oh. I thought I had this sorted, I can run the ant and maven builds
> locally, and all the examples were building for me.
>
> I will check again.
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> The build failed for some strange reason.  Might be a threading issue
>> unrelated to your changes.  I pulled everything and was able to build.
>> I've restarted the CI build to see if the same error comes up again.
>>
>> I also ran "ant sdk.dependent.tests flexjs.dependent.tests" and there were
>> a couple of failures in the compiler-ix tests.  There are files in
>> compiler-jx/src/test/resources/flexjs that need updating but it also
>> looks
>> like an extra new-line is being added after goog.inherits in some cases.
>> Let us know if you get the same results.
>>
>> Results are available in compiler-jx/target/junit-results.  If
>> TestFlexJSFile is reporting errors, there will be an xml file that ends
>> with TestFlexJSFIle.xml.  It will contain the string "<failure" for each
>> failure.  You will see an xml-escaped string with the error, in this case,
>> comparing the expected vs actual results.  You can use an unescape tool
>> like http://www.freeformatter.com/xml-escape.html#ad-output to get
>> readable text, then I have a utility hosted on at
>> http://home.apache.org/~aharui/TestResultCompare/TestResultCompare.html
>> that you can use to help you compare the results.  Paste the readable
>> results and hit the button, then scroll down the other TextAreas.  The
>> text will turn to bold where the first difference is found.  There is no
>> way to see all differences, just the first one so you have to make and
>> adjustment, re-run the test, re-compare the results.
>>
>> Hopefully that's enough info so you can figure it out.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to