I see it the same way ... Flex and FlexJS is good for me. The only thing I was having problems with, was the naming of the inside parts of FlexJS: falcon, falconjx, asjs, typedefs ... here I would like some sort of consolidation, but not really for Flex/FlexJS.
Chris ________________________________ Von: OK <p...@olafkrueger.net> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. September 2016 23:58:19 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Official naming for the "standard" Flex SDK Thanks for your thoughts Marc and Alex. >I am hopeful that the "JS" in FlexJS will be enough of a differentiator. FlexJS is definately clear and unambiguously. Maybe I was on the wrong track and Apache Flex/Apache FlexJS is sufficient. Thanks, Olaf -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/Official-naming-for-the-standard-Flex-SDK-tp54897p54938.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
