No We got error reports where the procedure in tracking down the cause was far from intuitive. I'm just pointing out that there is an enormous number of bad stuff in there and we should at least start cleaning up in order to make tracking down problems easier.
But I have the impression that no-one is actually looking at the reports cause everyone thinks his a real badass programmer. I regularly look at findings in my code in order to improve my coding skills, but guess I'm one of the few that think that way. Chris Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet. -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- Von: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> Datum: 14.07.16 16:36 (GMT+01:00) An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: Flash Builder borked On 7/14/16, 1:36 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: >Oh gee ... the flex-compiler-oem is the module sonar is complaining about >most with the badest words it can find ... I definitely hope it's not >something wrong in there. Flex-compiler-oem is mostly a hack to make Falcon look like MXMLC. It borrows lots of code from the flex-sdk, I don't think I wrote too much new code. You are welcome to clean up the code if this sort of thing bugs you. I'm just happy it mostly works so we can enable more folks to contribute something. FWIW, are you sure your frequent complaining about Sonar's results, which insinuate that folks in this community are writing bad code when the results are mostly about code we inherited, is inspiring people to contribute or could it be causing people to shy away? -Alex