I will ask on legal-discuss. IIRC, we were told once not to generate a missing NOTICE for a bundle, so IMO, we should not generate stuff missing from the LICENSE for a bundle.
-Alex On 4/1/16, 11:52 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >Hi, > >> No. I think it would be better if Google fixed their L&N first. Maybe >>you >> can get them to do that? > >The binary bundles software which contains BSD and other licensed >software that in not mentioned in the LICENSE and that is against ASF >release policy. [1] It’s not up to the Flex PMC to correct 3rd party >licensing issues, but it’s is the Flex PMC to correctly follow ASF >policy. I’ve raised an JIRA on this issue [2]. > >Thanks, >Justin > >1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary ><http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary> >2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-35058 ><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-35058> >
