On 12/10/15, 4:13 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>The new code had a successful build on the CI machine. The difference in >the build time is less than I would have thought it would be. It looks >like the tests are taking about 2 minutes less than they used to.[1] > >I guess that’s something, but I’m not sure it’s different enough for a >general time test. > >We could probably use the code in the test case on the JIRA[2] and test >that selectRange takes less than 50-100ms or so. If a full recompose is >triggered, it would take a full second or two. That's probably a reasonable attempt. Automated performance tests are often problematic because you'll get false alarms when the test runs while a system update or virus scan happened to be going on at the same time. But it probably won't be any worse the mustella false alarms we see on occasion as well. -Alex
