It looks like I don’t need 4.6. There’s a 3.0 branch in the Git repo which seems to have ti working correctly.
On Dec 7, 2015, at 3:19 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > OK. I’m working on this, and I just added a comment to the JIRA with my > preliminary observations. Kind of interesting... > > I’m going to need to find the source of the old TLF to compare. I don’t want > to use 4.9.1 because that code just had a band-aid. I assume Adobe's 4.6 code > was working correctly. > > I’m downloading 4.6 now from Adobe’s site. Hopefully I’ll be able to use and > build that… > > If anyone has any thoughts to help me on this, I’d appreciate it! ;-) > > Harbs > > On Nov 18, 2015, at 8:43 AM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> You had created such a flag, but enabling it causes lots of RTEs with the >> current code. >> >> I’d rather find the underlying cause of the problem which seems to be way >> too much recursion. >> >> I will try to take another look at this issue next week. >> >> On Nov 18, 2015, at 7:53 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >> >>> 2) TLF Performance >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34769 >>> >>> I’d like to get an update from Harbs. I haven’t spent any serious >>> thinking on the issue, but my recollection is that there is some snippet >>> of code we could disable or enable with a flag so folks can get old >>> behavior back if they don’t need whatever that new behavior was meant to >>> solve (which I think may have been related to table support). >> >
