On 9/18/15, 6:19 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> By commenting out the use of ViewBase from Application.as, I was able to
>> get Application.as to compile without errors and got what looked like a
>> reasonable list of goog.requires without changing any compiler.clients
>> classes.
>
>Have you try to run the compile-as-to-js-core-application-using-falcon
>target in the core build ?
>with this one and the convertion I did, I was able to build Application
>too without removing anything.
>
>I issue I had was with compile-as-to-js-core-application-using-oem.
I didn’t try that target yet. I will probably try later today.
>
>> I did notice that the method bodies that had conditional compilation
>> didn’t output anything so I’m going to look at that next. Or is that
>>what
>> you tried to fix by changing compiler.clients.*?
>
>No, it wasn't that, it seems you discovered another issue.
I have that issue fixed locally and saw what looked like a good
Application.js get generated, but I didn’t try running it yet. I will
probably convert a few more classes like ViewBase and then swap those
generated .js files into an existing app and see what happens.
>
>Btw, I won't be able to work on it this weekend, that's my birthday and
>I'm going to party (a lot) and on Monday I'm starting on a new role, not
>sure how much it will suck my brain yet.
OK, sounds good. Happy Birthday, and good luck with your new role.
I’ve been trying to get your GCL.swc to build from Ant without requiring
an application.home systemProperty. I ran into an issue with missing
builtins like Object. It could be that IJ injects these builtins no
matter what. From Ant I need to have GCL depend on js.swc, but then I get
other conflicts that I am trying to sort through in the compiler.
-Alex
