> I’m about to start writing HTMLElementWrapper.as and try to figure out
> where to put it. I don’t really want to have it in as/src, maybe in a new
> folder like js/as/src?
I probably have some changes not committed for this class but most of it was
converted making use of the GCL.swc
Also, I liked to have the AS and AS/JS counterpart in the same file, I thought
it was easier to maintain, what's wrong with this approach, why do you prefer
having them apart ?
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 19:31:45 +0000
>
> Hi Fred,
>
> I started out by trying to compile every AS file in Core with
> COMPILE::AS3,false and got lots of errors. I think you may have done that
> to keep them out of the errors list while you work on Application, so I’ve
> commented a lot of classes out of the build for now. I think for a lot of
> these classes, they won’t need conditional compilation.
>
> I only now figured out why you were concerned about Sprite. I will
> introduce an ApplicationBase.as class that abstracts away the differences.
>
> I’m about to start writing HTMLElementWrapper.as and try to figure out
> where to put it. I don’t really want to have it in as/src, maybe in a new
> folder like js/as/src?
>
> Thanks for getting this started.
> -Alex
>
> On 9/16/15, 12:20 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi Alex,
> >
> >Actually, I removed all the js files from the compilation path in order
> >to re-code them one by one in as3, so, all the existing classes already
> >in as3, I wrapped them with COMPILE::AS3 because for sure the output
> >artefact for them will be .swc
> >
> >I started to convert the Application sub components to as3 wrapping them
> >with COMPILE:JS because the output artefact for them will be .js
> >
> >Does it makes sense ?
> >
> >Note:
> >1- Those core classes in JS have been modified in the master branch, so,
> >my conversion is not in sync
> >2- I had t2 issues with the GCL.swc and Falcon, the one I mentioned
> >relative to the getter / setter at package level and another one I
> >haven't in mind at the moment but will describe tomorrow, proving more
> >details about the GCL.swc
> >
> >Frédéric THOMAS
> >
> >> From: aha...@adobe.com
> >> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
> >> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:54:06 +0000
> >>
> >> Hi Fred,
> >>
> >> I started poking around in the branch. I’m confused by how you plan to
> >> use the conditional compilation flags. Whole classes seem to be marked
> >> with COMPILE::AS3, but I would expect any conditional compilation to be
> >>on
> >> or inside methods. Can you explain?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 9/16/15, 2:26 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hi Alex,
> >> >
> >> >Cool, Btw, I didn't fix the bug I had with the flex-oem-compiler yet
> >> >given I will move those things to IJ, neither the one regarding the
> >> >getter / setter functions at package level.
> >> >
> >> >I will share the CGL.swc with its sources and details as soon as I can,
> >> >probably tomorrow along with the Ant targets using the
> >>compiler.clients.*
> >> >
> >> >Thanks,
> >> >Frédéric THOMAS
> >> >
> >> >> From: aha...@adobe.com
> >> >> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >> >> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
> >> >> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 06:08:33 +0000
> >> >>
> >> >> FYI, I’m going to start finding time to work on this port.
> >> >>
> >> >> -Alex
> >> >>
> >> >> On 9/9/15, 6:19 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >On 9/9/15, 3:12 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
> >>wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>One thing I discovered though is that with Falcon, the combination
> >>of
> >> >> >>getter / setter for a same function at package level is not
> >>supported
> >> >> >>(the legacy compiler support it):
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>package goog.events {
> >> >> >>public function get fireListener():Function{return null;}
> >> >> >>public function set fireListener(value:Function):void{}
> >> >> >>}
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>Error: An externally-visible definition with the name
> >> >> >>'goog.events.fireListener' was unexpectedly found.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>Can you take care of it or drive me into fixing it ?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >That’s interesting. I’ve never seen a ‘global’ property in AS
> >>before.
> >> >> If
> >> >> >you want to try to fix it, what I would do is set a breakpoint in
> >> >> >CompilerProblem.java. Then you’ll see on the call stack what logic
> >> >> >decided to generate that error and can try to add other logic to
> >> >>accept it
> >> >> >in this case.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Speaking of doing things like that, it occurred to me recently that
> >> >> >ambiguous definition errors when the global Event class conflicts
> >>with
> >> >> >org.apache.flex.events.Events could be handled by adjusting the
> >>logic
> >> >>for
> >> >> >detecting ambiguous definitions. IIRC, the logic resolves the
> >>“Event”
> >> >>and
> >> >> >if it finds more than one definition it generates the error. The
> >>logic
> >> >> >could be adjusted to see if one of the definitions is a global
> >> >>definition
> >> >> >and then use the global and maybe additionally generate a warning
> >> >>instead
> >> >> >of an error.
> >> >> >BTW, it looks like this week and next will be spent on getting a
> >> >>release
> >> >> >out the door, then I hope to work on this port from JS to AS.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >-Alex
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
