Awesome.  Every little bit helps.

-Alex

On 8/3/15, 12:00 PM, "Josh Tynjala" <joshtynj...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Alex,
>
>I took care of the things in the js/bin directory. Executables for externc
>and compcjsc have been added. jsc and jquery now use -js-output-type=jsc.
>I'm now able to build my projects using only what's in js/bin, so things
>should work well from the command line now.
>
>I'm not sure what to change to include the JS extern files in the final
>build, so I'll leave that to you or someone else.
>
>- Josh
>
>On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> I'll see what I can fit in on Monday.
>>
>> - Josh
>> On Jul 31, 2015 11:26 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>>> OK.  If you can help out on these that would be great, otherwise I will
>>> try to get to it.
>>>
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>> On 7/31/15, 5:14 PM, "Josh Tynjala" <joshtynj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >I am able to download the latest nightly successfully using the Apache
>>> >Flex
>>> >Installer 3.2.
>>> >
>>> >I ran into some issues with the SDK, though:
>>> >
>>> >1) jsc and jsc.bat in js/bin don't yet set -js-output-type=jsc.
>>> >
>>> >2) Should js/bin also have a compcjsc and compcjsc.bat files that
>>>invoke
>>> >js/lib/compc.jar, but set -js-output-type=jsc?
>>> >
>>> >3) externc is only available as a JAR file. There are no executables
>>>in
>>> >the
>>> >js/bin folder that can invoke js/lib/externc.jar. If we want externc
>>>to
>>> >run
>>> >easily from the command line, the js/bin folder should have externc
>>>and
>>> >externc.bat.
>>> >
>>> >4) When using externc, if I need classes from JS.swc, I'm not
>>>supposed to
>>> >link to the compiled JS.swc. I encountered errors when I originally
>>> tried,
>>> >and Mike explained that instead, I need the raw JS files (like
>>> w3c_dom1.js
>>> >and others). These raw JS files are not included in the SDK that I
>>> >installed, so I can't easily create new externs that reference any
>>> classes
>>> >defined in JS.swc. I'm forced to find these raw JS files in the repo
>>> >instead.
>>> >
>>> >- Josh
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >>
>>> >> I have DataBindingTest working as well as it ever has (not
>>> pixel-perfect
>>> >> yet, but getting closer), and I also tried Carlos’ suggestion and
>>> >> installed the latest nightly build on Windows and was able to use
>>> >>Notepad
>>> >> and the Command Prompt to cross-compile DataBindingTest without any
>>> >> further setup.   So I think we really are on the runway for the next
>>> >> release.  Here are some things I think we should consider doing
>>>before
>>> >>we
>>> >> release, but I can probably be convinced to punt all of them to a
>>> future
>>> >> release.  I’m just thinking it would be worth another week or two to
>>> >>add a
>>> >> bit of polish (depending on what folks think we can drop, what new
>>> >>things
>>> >> we add, and how many folks help out).
>>> >>
>>> >> 1) Tune FlexJSStore, ChartExample, DataGridExample, Mobile Trader -
>>> This
>>> >> will help make sure the JS version will look like the AS version.
>>> We’ve
>>> >> made significant changes to the layout subsystem recently.
>>> >>
>>> >> 2) Fix the Function handling in JS so you get the same closure every
>>> >>time
>>> >> [1].  Josh has worked around this in his example, but I think folks
>>> will
>>> >> hit this a lot.
>>> >>
>>> >> 3) Move following examples to a new Test folder: ContainerTest,
>>> >> FlexJSTest, ImageTest, ListsTest, LanguageTests, RollEventsTest,
>>> >> VanillaSDK_POC
>>> >>
>>> >> 4) delete the following examples: StatesTest, StockQuote (these have
>>> >>been
>>> >> incorporated into DataBindingTest)
>>> >>
>>> >> 5) rename DataBindingTest to DataBindingExample or FirstExample or
>>> >> something like that
>>> >>
>>> >> 6) See if we can get DataBindingTest working with JQuery and
>>>CreateJS
>>> >>and
>>> >> remove their FlexJSTest examples.
>>> >>
>>> >> 7) change version number to 0.3
>>> >>
>>> >> 8) HTML wrapper generator - I noticed when using just NotePad and
>>> >>Command
>>> >> Prompt that no code generates the HTML wrapper for the SWF version.
>>> >>There
>>> >> are Ant tasks that do that, but can we require folks to have Ant?
>>>I’m
>>> >> thinking of adding an option to Falcon called -generate-html that
>>> >>controls
>>> >> whether html wrappers are generated for both SWF and JS compilation.
>>> >>
>>> >> 9) JS swc examples - Did these get checked in somewhere?
>>> >>
>>> >> 10) Wiki doc - This can be done while the vote is underway, but the
>>> docs
>>> >> could use an upgrade.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thoughts?
>>> >> -Alex
>>> >>
>>> >> [1]
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> 
>>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Simulating+AS3+language
>>>+
>>> >>fe
>>> >>
>>>
>>> 
>>>>>atures+in+JavaScript+using+AMD+and+ES5#SimulatingAS3languagefeaturesin
>>>>>Jav
>>> >>aS
>>> >> criptusingAMDandES5-Boundmethods
>>> >> [1] http://s.apache.org/gxi
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to