I'll see what I can fit in on Monday.

- Josh
On Jul 31, 2015 11:26 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:

> OK.  If you can help out on these that would be great, otherwise I will
> try to get to it.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 7/31/15, 5:14 PM, "Josh Tynjala" <joshtynj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I am able to download the latest nightly successfully using the Apache
> >Flex
> >Installer 3.2.
> >
> >I ran into some issues with the SDK, though:
> >
> >1) jsc and jsc.bat in js/bin don't yet set -js-output-type=jsc.
> >
> >2) Should js/bin also have a compcjsc and compcjsc.bat files that invoke
> >js/lib/compc.jar, but set -js-output-type=jsc?
> >
> >3) externc is only available as a JAR file. There are no executables in
> >the
> >js/bin folder that can invoke js/lib/externc.jar. If we want externc to
> >run
> >easily from the command line, the js/bin folder should have externc and
> >externc.bat.
> >
> >4) When using externc, if I need classes from JS.swc, I'm not supposed to
> >link to the compiled JS.swc. I encountered errors when I originally tried,
> >and Mike explained that instead, I need the raw JS files (like w3c_dom1.js
> >and others). These raw JS files are not included in the SDK that I
> >installed, so I can't easily create new externs that reference any classes
> >defined in JS.swc. I'm forced to find these raw JS files in the repo
> >instead.
> >
> >- Josh
> >
> >
> >On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have DataBindingTest working as well as it ever has (not pixel-perfect
> >> yet, but getting closer), and I also tried Carlos’ suggestion and
> >> installed the latest nightly build on Windows and was able to use
> >>Notepad
> >> and the Command Prompt to cross-compile DataBindingTest without any
> >> further setup.   So I think we really are on the runway for the next
> >> release.  Here are some things I think we should consider doing before
> >>we
> >> release, but I can probably be convinced to punt all of them to a future
> >> release.  I’m just thinking it would be worth another week or two to
> >>add a
> >> bit of polish (depending on what folks think we can drop, what new
> >>things
> >> we add, and how many folks help out).
> >>
> >> 1) Tune FlexJSStore, ChartExample, DataGridExample, Mobile Trader - This
> >> will help make sure the JS version will look like the AS version.  We’ve
> >> made significant changes to the layout subsystem recently.
> >>
> >> 2) Fix the Function handling in JS so you get the same closure every
> >>time
> >> [1].  Josh has worked around this in his example, but I think folks will
> >> hit this a lot.
> >>
> >> 3) Move following examples to a new Test folder: ContainerTest,
> >> FlexJSTest, ImageTest, ListsTest, LanguageTests, RollEventsTest,
> >> VanillaSDK_POC
> >>
> >> 4) delete the following examples: StatesTest, StockQuote (these have
> >>been
> >> incorporated into DataBindingTest)
> >>
> >> 5) rename DataBindingTest to DataBindingExample or FirstExample or
> >> something like that
> >>
> >> 6) See if we can get DataBindingTest working with JQuery and CreateJS
> >>and
> >> remove their FlexJSTest examples.
> >>
> >> 7) change version number to 0.3
> >>
> >> 8) HTML wrapper generator - I noticed when using just NotePad and
> >>Command
> >> Prompt that no code generates the HTML wrapper for the SWF version.
> >>There
> >> are Ant tasks that do that, but can we require folks to have Ant?  I’m
> >> thinking of adding an option to Falcon called -generate-html that
> >>controls
> >> whether html wrappers are generated for both SWF and JS compilation.
> >>
> >> 9) JS swc examples - Did these get checked in somewhere?
> >>
> >> 10) Wiki doc - This can be done while the vote is underway, but the docs
> >> could use an upgrade.
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> [1]
> >>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Simulating+AS3+language+
> >>fe
> >>
> >>atures+in+JavaScript+using+AMD+and+ES5#SimulatingAS3languagefeaturesinJav
> >>aS
> >> criptusingAMDandES5-Boundmethods
> >> [1] http://s.apache.org/gxi
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to