Fred, I think I tried it correctly, but am not getting the private
function in the constructor. What setting are you using?
-Alex
On 6/25/15, 8:02 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Ah ok. That’s probably a bug. Not sure why, but the emitters currently
>> initialize private members in the constructor. We discussed on some
>>other
>> thread a while back that this shouldn’t be necessary except for
>>non-scalar
>> initializers, so probably we should try to change this someday.
>
>Initializing methods in the constructor via myPrivateMethod = function()
>{) will make it private but public instance methods not initialized in
>the constructor won't be able to access it, public methods which aim to
>access private methods need also to be declared in the contructor (eg.
>"this.myPublicMethod = function() {return myPrivateMethod())")
>
>But do we need to replicate the AS3 NS behaviour in JS (public, private,
>protected, custom NS) ?
>
>Has it been already discussed ?
>
>I'm not sure, my first answer would be no as the the developer will
>develop in AS3 but if the code to be tested is the JS, I would answer
>yes, we must reproduce what AS3 promises, the public, protected, private
>and custom NS for classes and instances.
>
>Thoughts ?
>
>Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
>----------------------------------------
>> From: aha...@adobe.com
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but
>>we now have 1.9 in AS
>> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:37:30 +0000
>>
>> Ah ok. That’s probably a bug. Not sure why, but the emitters currently
>> initialize private members in the constructor. We discussed on some
>>other
>> thread a while back that this shouldn’t be necessary except for
>>non-scalar
>> initializers, so probably we should try to change this someday.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 6/25/15, 5:30 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>That remains me, if I change my start() function to either public or
>>>>>private, the cross compiled one is Main.prototype.start = function()
>>>>>hence it becomes public, only the @public / @private annotation
>>>>>changes,
>>>>>is that expected ?
>>>>
>>>> I’m not sure I understand. What was it otherwise?
>>>
>>>Using inner construstor functions:
>>>
>>>--------------------------------------
>>>- Public function
>>>--------------------------------------
>>>
>>>public class Main {
>>> public function start():void {
>>> HtmlContainer.load([JQUERY_SCRIPT], run);
>>> }
>>>}
>>>
>>>/**
>>> * @constructor
>>> */
>>>Main = function() {
>>> /**
>>> * @public
>>> */
>>> this.start = function() {
>>> HtmlContainer.load([Main.JQUERY_SCRIPT], Main.run);
>>> };
>>>};
>>>
>>>--------------------------------------
>>>- Private function
>>>--------------------------------------
>>>
>>>public class Main {
>>> private function start():void {
>>> HtmlContainer.load([Main.JQUERY_SCRIPT], run);
>>> }
>>>}
>>>
>>>
>>>/**
>>> * @constructor
>>> */
>>>Main = function() {
>>> /**
>>> * @private
>>> */
>>> start = function() {
>>> HtmlContainer.load([Main.JQUERY_SCRIPT], Main.run);
>>> };
>>>};
>>>
>>>
>>>Frédéric THOMAS
>>>
>>>
>>>----------------------------------------
>>>> From: aha...@adobe.com
>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but
>>>>we now have 1.9 in AS
>>>> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 04:57:48 +0000
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 6/24/15, 6:43 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> When we wrote js we were not sure of naming conventions. Google
>>>>>seems to like backing variables to end with dash but flex starts with
>>>>>dash. Not sure what to do. I'm thinking we change to end with dash.
>>>>>
>>>>>Even though those 2 properties are public ?
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, I took a closer look. There shouldn’t be _ on those properties.
>>>> Keep in mind that there has been relatively little testing on this
>>>>code.
>>>> We get the examples to work and call it “done for now”.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>That remains me, if I change my start() function to either public or
>>>>>private, the cross compiled one is Main.prototype.start = function()
>>>>>hence it becomes public, only the @public / @private annotation
>>>>>changes,
>>>>>is that expected ?
>>>>
>>>> I’m not sure I understand. What was it otherwise?
>>>>
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
