Oh yeah, I did remember the goog bind() for even listeners but it was raining last night so I didn't put 2 and 2 together, blame it on the rain...
Mike On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Michael Schmalle <teotigraphix...@gmail.com > wrote: > Well, I was only trying to be nice but, if you know how to fix this sooner > than later, do it. I have this next week or two left with very little time, > more like just enough to send emails. > > Mike > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:13 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 6/28/15, 2:21 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com> >> >wrote: >> > >> >> Yes, that is correct. >> >> >> >> In case it wasn't obvious, event listeners are the typical use case >> >>where >> >> you'd pass a reference to a member function somewhere else where a >> >> reference needs to be saved in a variable. AS3 made this easy by >> >> automatically binding member functions. JavaScript usually requires >> some >> >> manual intervention to get event listeners to be called with the right >> >> scope. >> >> >> > >> >Yeah the compiler does this already for anonymous functions, it creates a >> >self var pointing to 'this' and then uses self in the anonymous >> function's >> >body. >> >> Actually, that ‘self’ stuff is for AS lexical scoping. Josh is more >> interested in the use of goog.bind for function identifiers. FalconJX >> handles that correctly in most cases for addEventListener and other >> callbacks, but I guess we don’t handle this scenario. >> >> I can try to take a look at it, but if you want to, search for GOOG_BIND. >> >> > >> >I wasn't aware of this problem though, can you create a JIRA ticket? I >> >probably will be the one that tackles it since I am sure Alex doesn't >> have >> >time to do something like this and test it as well. >> >> Well, I can probably get it working, but I’m sure I won’t test it as well >> as you will. >> >> -Alex >> >> >
