On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've manually converted some of the TypeScript definitions for CreateJS > into AS3 classes using the native keyword. I'll finish them up and share > the results when I get a chance. I'm super busy with the Feathers SDK and > Feathers 2.2 right now, and that has priority for the moment. > Josh I understand. I have read what you are getting ready to release. Hopefully in a couple months you can get some to to go in the labs. :) I have work as well but I just wanted to kick this out the last week because my mind was into it. Note; I tired using the native keyword and for some reason with the COMPC compiler, it excluded optional arguments, so I changed them to class stubs, you might just want to do that. BTW, I am heavily using Feathers 2.1 right now and can't wait for the feathers SDK. You had mentioned Intellij, I use it a lot and could help you test it if you need it. Mike > > - Josh > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Michael Schmalle < > teotigraphix...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I figured as much. > > > > This is really still considered prototype, qualified names are not > resolved > > yet, only global classes/functions etc work. > > > > For this to work with FlexJS emitter, we have to figure out the > > org_foo_bar_Class thing because a lot of bolt on extensions are going to > > need dot notation. I wasn't around to know why you chose to do this, > maybe > > you can fill me in. > > > > But I know we will at least need a flag on how to emit packageNames. > > > > I figure there is a couple weeks for me writing tests for all the > different > > types and google annotation digesting. But at least if you get this > > building, people could start to try and use the library JS with FlexJS. > > > > I will get JQuery working, if Josh pipes in sometime, I would like to > know > > what he wants for stubs so I can test write them so he could try and > > experiment with his proto project when he gets time. > > > > Once I get this thing stable with the core DOM that we have compiling > right > > now, I will work on FlexJS's js getting ported to as eventually. > > > > Another thing, IntelliJ doesn't recognize Object in the JS swc, it uses > > it's own ECMA stubs file. So right now we don't have access to such > things > > as Object.create() that ARE defined in the SWC. This is what is defined > in > > the SWC right now; > > > > static native public function create(proto:Object,opt_properties:Object = > > null):Object; > > > > I hope some people start using this so I can see where it breaks. But I > > know it needs to get in the nightly builds and announced, for anybody to > > know about it and try to use, it. :) > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On 6/9/15, 2:19 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > >One more thing, there are warnings that emit from the GCC during > > compiler, > > > >they don't matter right now, it's not running in ES6 mode. They are > not > > > >errors that kill compile. > > > > > > > >I will be working on this the next couple days, so it's going to get > > > >majorly refactored and tested, so please let me know if you are going > to > > > >change anything(I doubt it). :) > > > > > > I will hopefully only be messing with Ant scripts so hopefully we won’t > > > trip over each other. > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > >
