I figured as much.

This is really still considered prototype, qualified names are not resolved
yet, only global classes/functions etc work.

For this to work with FlexJS emitter, we have to figure out the
org_foo_bar_Class thing because a lot of bolt on extensions are going to
need dot notation. I wasn't around to know why you chose to do this, maybe
you can fill me in.

But I know we will at least need a flag on how to emit packageNames.

I figure there is a couple weeks for me writing tests for all the different
types and google annotation digesting. But at least if you get this
building, people could start to try and use the library JS with FlexJS.

I will get JQuery working, if Josh pipes in sometime, I would like to know
what he wants for stubs so I can test write them so he could try and
experiment with his proto project when he gets time.

Once I get this thing stable with the core DOM that we have compiling right
now, I will work on FlexJS's js getting ported to as eventually.

Another thing, IntelliJ doesn't recognize Object in the JS swc, it uses
it's own ECMA stubs file. So right now we don't have access to such things
as Object.create() that ARE defined in the SWC. This is what is defined in
the SWC right now;

static native public function create(proto:Object,opt_properties:Object =
null):Object;

I hope some people start using this so I can see where it breaks. But I
know it needs to get in the nightly builds and announced, for anybody to
know about it and try to use, it. :)

Mike




On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 6/9/15, 2:19 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >One more thing, there are warnings that emit from the GCC during compiler,
> >they don't matter right now, it's not running in ES6 mode. They are not
> >errors that kill compile.
> >
> >I will be working on this the next couple days, so it's going to get
> >majorly refactored and tested, so please let me know if you are going to
> >change anything(I doubt it). :)
>
> I will hopefully only be messing with Ant scripts so hopefully we won’t
> trip over each other.
>
> -Alex
>
>

Reply via email to