> I had thoughts of teaching
> CompJSC to stuff the JS files into the same swc specified by the -output > option, but ran out of time. Do you mean we could compile SWC(+JS) into one compilation phase ? Frédéric THOMAS > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: RE: [Falcon.jx] -library-path > Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 23:04:19 +0100 > > > BTW, assuming we’ll have Mike’s AS to JS compiler, the JS files will soon > > be generated by running a CompC like tool. I had thoughts of teaching > > CompJSC to stuff the JS files into the same swc specified by the -output > > option, but ran out of time. > > I would like to see that happening. > > 1- I didn't follow totally the thread relative to what mike what doing, do > you mean it will do all the job that the COMPJSC does when converting AS to > JS ? > > 2- I'm chaining the compiler calls and I'm about to generate the JS (first > compilation phase) to the sub-output folder and include those JS files into > the SWC on the second compilation phase. > > Doing so, with what I already did, it would result in IntelliJ that the user > will have the same kind of configuration than today except he will have to > set the custom intellij-config.xml preferabily at project level and set > -js-output-type=FLEXJS_DUAL in additional compiler arguments. > > > Frédéric THOMAS > > > From: aha...@adobe.com > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [Falcon.jx] -library-path > > Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 20:47:33 +0000 > > > > BTW, assuming we’ll have Mike’s AS to JS compiler, the JS files will soon > > be generated by running a CompC like tool. I had thoughts of teaching > > CompJSC to stuff the JS files into the same swc specified by the -output > > option, but ran out of time. > > > > -Alex > > > > On 6/1/15, 11:46 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> The drawback is there are too much build confs and args too > > >pass, I guess it can refrain the users, I would like to make it more > > >friendly: > > >> > > >> - compile both swc + js or swf + js if -js-output-type=FLEXJS_DUAL, > > > calling chained both of the compiler having generated the include-file > > >first > > >> - add a include-all-classes and exclude-classes > > > > > >It seems I won't have to do the second item. > > >Instead I created a /ide/IntelliJ/flex-config.xml that overrides as > > >needed the intelliJ one, doing so, we benefit of the IntelliJ > > >configuration too, the override can be done, per module or per project, > > >this one is more convenient when the project contains only FlexJS > > >relative stuffs. > > > > > >I would have liked its option to include files into the swc be as smart > > >as the include-files but it is not, it doesn't remap the entry, it only > > >includes the file with the same path. > > > > > >So, I still need to implement the first item. > > > > > >Frédéric THOMAS > > > > > >> From: aha...@adobe.com > > >> To: webdoubl...@hotmail.com; dev@flex.apache.org > > >> Subject: Re: [Falcon.jx] -library-path > > >> Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 20:30:45 +0000 > > >> > > >> I'm in favor of automating any repetitive process. Things are the way > > >>they are due to lack of time. > > >> > > >> > > >> Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone > > >> > > >> > > >> ------ Original message------ > > >> > > >> From: Frédéric THOMAS > > >> > > >> Date: Sat, May 30, 2015 1:24 PM > > >> > > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org; > > >> > > >> Subject:RE: [Falcon.jx] -library-path > > >> > > >> > > >> It worked better but compilation failed with one error but the problem > > >>hasn't been reported, I will have to dig into. > > >> > > >> The drawback is there are too much build confs and args too pass, I > > >>guess it can refrain the users, I would like to make it more friendly: > > >> > > >> - compile both swc + js or swf + js if -js-output-type=FLEXJS_DUAL, > > >>calling chained both of the compiler having generated the include-file > > >>first > > >> - add a include-all-classes and exclude-classes > > >> > > >> Thought ? > > >> > > >> Frédéric THOMAS > > >> > > >> > From: aha...@adobe.com > > >> > To: webdoubl...@hotmail.com; dev@flex.apache.org > > >> > Subject: Re: [Falcon.jx] -library-path > > >> > Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 19:33:04 +0000 > > >> > > > >> > The swcs we build use include-file in compile-config.xml. we > > >>currently run compc after compjsc. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > ------ Original message------ > > >> > > > >> > From: Frédéric THOMAS > > >> > > > >> > Date: Sat, May 30, 2015 12:28 PM > > >> > > > >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org; > > >> > > > >> > Subject:RE: [Falcon.jx] -library-path > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Is this with ij or ant as well? > > >> > > > >> > I build the lib with IJ using the default flex-config.xml and no > > >>other argument, it results in a swc without the JS, adding > > >>-js-output-type=FLEXJS, I get the js, my question was, is there already > > >>something to build the swc included the js (and catalog updated I guess) > > >>? > > >> > > > >> > >From ant we build framework swc and compile apps > > >> > > > >> > I didn't get that !? > > >> > > > >> > Frédéric THOMAS > > >> > > > >> > > From: aha...@adobe.com > > >> > > To: webdoubl...@hotmail.com; dev@flex.apache.org > > >> > > Subject: Re: [Falcon.jx] -library-path > > >> > > Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 19:21:22 +0000 > > >> > > > > >> > > Is this with ij or ant as well? From ant we build framework swc and > > >>compile apps > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > ------ Original message------ > > >> > > > > >> > > From: Frédéric THOMAS > > >> > > > > >> > > Date: Sat, May 30, 2015 11:58 AM > > >> > > > > >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>; > > >> > > > > >> > > Subject:[Falcon.jx] -library-path > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > Hi, > > >> > > > > >> > > I was trying to compile an App with a Lib in FlexJS and seen few > > >>things: > > >> > > > > >> > > - The MXMLFlexJSPublisher doesn't pass the the ProblemQuery to > > >>GoogDepsWriter.getListOfFile, we end up with a NPE (easy to fix) > > >> > > - The addDeps() throws a RTE instead of a Problem, what do we want > > >>as Problem here ? > > >> > > > > >> > > Adding models/MyModel.js to the swc didn't work for me, I didn't > > >>check but my guess is because it was not added to the catalog ? > > >> > > > > >> > > How am I suppose to proceed to compile in the same time my swc / js > > >>and having it included ? > > >> > > > > >> > > Frédéric THOMAS > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >
