It worked better but compilation failed with one error but the problem hasn't 
been reported, I will have to dig into.

The drawback is there are too much build confs and args too pass, I guess it 
can refrain the users, I would like to make it more friendly:

- compile both swc + js or swf + js if -js-output-type=FLEXJS_DUAL, calling 
chained both of the compiler having generated the include-file first
- add a include-all-classes and exclude-classes

Thought ?

Frédéric THOMAS

> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: webdoubl...@hotmail.com; dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Falcon.jx] -library-path
> Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 19:33:04 +0000
> 
> The swcs we build use include-file in compile-config.xml. we currently run 
> compc after compjsc.
> 
> 
> Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
> 
> 
> ------ Original message------
> 
> From: Frédéric THOMAS
> 
> Date: Sat, May 30, 2015 12:28 PM
> 
> To: dev@flex.apache.org;
> 
> Subject:RE: [Falcon.jx] -library-path
> 
> 
> > Is this with ij or ant as well?
> 
> I build the lib with IJ using the default flex-config.xml and no other 
> argument, it results in a swc without the JS, adding -js-output-type=FLEXJS, 
> I get the js, my question was, is there already something to build the swc 
> included the js (and catalog updated I guess) ?
> 
> >From ant we build framework swc and compile apps
> 
> I didn't get that !?
> 
> Frédéric THOMAS
> 
> > From: aha...@adobe.com
> > To: webdoubl...@hotmail.com; dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [Falcon.jx] -library-path
> > Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 19:21:22 +0000
> >
> > Is this with ij or ant as well? From ant we build framework swc and compile 
> > apps
> >
> >
> > Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
> >
> >
> > ------ Original message------
> >
> > From: Frédéric THOMAS
> >
> > Date: Sat, May 30, 2015 11:58 AM
> >
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>;
> >
> > Subject:[Falcon.jx] -library-path
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was trying to compile an App with a Lib in FlexJS and seen few things:
> >
> > - The MXMLFlexJSPublisher doesn't pass the the ProblemQuery to 
> > GoogDepsWriter.getListOfFile, we end up with a NPE (easy to fix)
> > - The addDeps() throws a RTE instead of a Problem, what do we want as 
> > Problem here ?
> >
> > Adding models/MyModel.js to the swc didn't work for me, I didn't check but 
> > my guess is because it was not added to the catalog ?
> >
> > How am I suppose to proceed to compile in the same time my swc / js and 
> > having it included ?
> >
> > Frédéric THOMAS
> 
                                          

Reply via email to