Donation procedures were followed correctly. Could some file have incorrect provenance? Sure. The probability pretty much can never go to zero. IF we find mistakes we will correct them. You may spend as much time as you wish scrubbing, but please try to limit the amount of community energy spent dealing with your quest. It is great when you find good stuff, but often your findings aren't quite correct. For example, so far, nobody else has found the BlazeDS and TLF sources missing. And there is an IP Clearance form and email trail for BlazeDS. Folks have complained to me off-list that the tone and volume of emails that result from these quests tend to discourage their participation and make you appear adversarial rather than collegial. I’m sure you don’t want that to be a side-effect.
I have done my due diligence on the package we need to vote on and have voted. -Alex On 1/23/15, 11:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >Hi, > >> I just saw your vote. Can you provide more detail in this thread? I >>have >> no idea what your objection is based on. > >See my reply to your other email. Looks like IP review may of been >skipped (?) and while we not using the full repos the fact we have files >that shouldn't be there in version control is some cause for concern. Can >we be sure of the provenance of the files we are using? I see some files >may of had Apache headers added where they probably shouldn't be. Do we >know if any headers have been replaced and not reflected in NOTICE? Do we >event have the files pre donation to compare with? > >Thanks, >Justin
