Hi, > Are you intentionally trying to misrepresent the 'less-RC' process?
Of course not, but we need as many RC as we need to get it right. The aim is fewer RCs and while the idea number would be one that's IMO going to be hard to achieve in practise. For whatever reason people only check in detail when it matters ie when we have an RC to vote on. Ask yourself why didn't any other PMC member pick up those license issues? In hindsight it's sort of obvious to double check the source LICENSE given the binary one had issues, but I (and probably others) just assumed they were correct. Justin
