Hi, > That was my point. Unless we find out that Saxon has some unfriendly > dependencies, the question of whether a binary dependency in the package > was compiled from sources or not or whether the Installer should ask about > MPL and MIT dependencies probably doesn't put the foundation at risk, so > the worst case is you hit send on the announcement and we hear back at > that moment that there is a rule like that and we have start in on fixing > that, but I would be surprised if we have to pull it back.
You seem to be be forgetting that the LICENSE and NOTICE files are currently incorrect. That's generally a release blocker. Justin
