AFAIK Builder still gets updates. The Adobe white paper has a commitment
to make it continue to work with Apache Flex.
We shouldn't break (any) 3rd party products if we can avoid doing so.
Chris' point is also valid about companies being slow to move
development platforms, and we'd probably trap them into using the last
4.x 'forever'.
And there's no need to bump the major part of a version number. Look at
Java 1.8 ;-)
Tom
On 09/12/14 17:31, Kessler CTR Mark J wrote:
Although I don't think we should be bending over backwards for an IDE that is
now from our standpoint 3rd Party. Especially since it's not being updated.
-Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Chiverton [mailto:t...@extravision.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:03 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Next version of Flex SDK
I thought so too.
Tom
On 08/12/14 20:37, Erik de Bruin wrote:
Didn't Alex find that the current FB requires the leading 4?
EdB
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________
