Thanks for the feedback, folks. So, 4.14.0, it is :-) Thanks, Om On Dec 8, 2014 2:25 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> +1 with that Peter > > Btw, have you also switched to Outlook as I can see the ' are replaced > with ¹ ? > > Frédéric THOMAS > > > From: p...@adobe.com > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Next version of Flex SDK > > Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 22:18:26 +0000 > > > > I think you¹d want to go to a new major version if something really > > significant changed. For example, an entirely new MXML (e.g., FlexJS > > became to default) or major changes to ActionScript. Simply adding new > > components and fixed bugs does not, to me, warrant a bump in version from > > 4 to 5. > > > > Peter Ent > > Adobe Systems > > > > On 12/8/14, 4:41 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >I¹m not a big fan of xx.xx.xx.xx, but I do not see why it should go from > > >4 to 5. The stability of the major version number in Flex is well > > >grounded. > > > > > >I¹d vote to just make it 4.15 and keep upping the minor number with each > > >release. The only reason to make a 4.15.1 release (or the like) would be > > >for a hot fix of a problematic release. > > > > > >Harbs > > > > > >
