Justin, Please see [1]. I don't accept the veto, as I don't see how changing a wiki text is against Apache policy.
I've reworded the sentence to make it's intention clearer. It's a practical one statement, meant to help an RM avoid starting a release that nobody else cares enough about to help with. At the same time, it is meant to help the community - and especially the PMC - by not being 'forced' to deal with minor releases they may not have time to properly check out and vote on. EdB 1: http://markmail.org/message/qsv4bwxxlvaaschq On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > Hi, > >> This message wasn't delivered as I suspect you intended. > > In that it wasn't sent to dev? OK resending to dev. > > -1 (and that's a veto). Please revert these changes and open to discussion > first. Why? There's been no agreement on "After polling the dev@ list to see > if there is enough interest in creating a release" and that's not Apache > policy. > > Justin -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
