Hi,

> -1 As discussed there are cases where this may not be the best 
choice of action for the RM or the project, ie involving legal issues. 
Hopefully those situations will be rare but we've already run into it 
once.

Do you mean the RM is more qualified than other voting people for what is 
regarding legal issues or has more responsibilities on legal as RM ?

> A clarification please. Are you also saying that this should also 
apply in all cases even when there have been code changes?

It has been stated many times: when there have been no code changes.

Frédéric THOMAS

> Subject: Re: Carried RC Votes
> From: jus...@classsoftware.com
> Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 23:31:41 +1100
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > A vote is a personal thing. Everyone is responsible for their own vote.
> 
> As long as it complies with this:
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> 
> > If the caster of a vote wishes to 'carry' that vote to a new RC, that
> > means the vote should apply - without reservation - to that new RC.
> 
> -1 As discussed there are cases where this may not be the best choice of 
> action for the RM or the project, ie involving legal issues. Hopefully those 
> situations will be rare but we've already run into it once.
> 
> A clarification please. Are you also saying that this should also apply in 
> all cases even when there have been code changes?
> 
> Justin
                                          

Reply via email to