I would want Rich and/or Bertrand to confirm that you can in fact vote +1 without checking sigs and running the build and doing some sort of test, but I would be surprised if anyone felt that you had to run the same tests on RCN that you ran on RCN-1 if no code changed. On TDF, I doubt if any voter checked all 300 samples, and the build itself took a significant amount of time on slower machines.
If you can in fact vote +1 by inference or deduction then I agree we can do away with the whole carry over concept. -Alex On 12/6/14, 3:10 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >Hi, > >> If the guidelines are clear, where does the need for RM's discretion >>arise? > >The term non code change could be open to interpretation (and I recall >has been) so I'd prefer if that was left in. For instance is changing an >xml config file, a html file, or a build script considered a code change? >The answer is probably context dependant ie in some cases yes it should >be and in some cases it may not matter, probably best to let the RM >decide. > >Thanks, >Justin
