I think this discussion has gone on long enough. Time to stop trying to convince each other, as that obviously is not going to happen.
Is there something here that can be resolved by a vote? If so, please start a VOTE thread. Otherwise let's end this discussion and move on. Thanks, EdB On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > Again, you seem to have a different definition of “should”[1]. Nowhere does > it state that if you do not mention it when you start the thread, the votes > can not carry over. > > Of course it’s the RM’s choice. No one has stated that Om’s vote was valid if > you refused to carry it over. You said you COULDN’T carry it over. That’s not > true. You refused to carry it over. That’s a very different thing. > > [1]http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/should > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
