The wiki page had become annotated with issue discussions. I just rewrote the entire document, trying to make it shorter, removing history and rationale and just describing the steps, but addressing/clarifing issues raised. I left the original document below so you can compare and make sure your important points are still included.
Hopefully this will help, but maybe it won’t. I’m off to bed, and will check feedback in the morning. -Alex On 12/4/14, 5:01 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Justin Mclean <justinmcl...@me.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> > You interpreted it wrong. That voter thought non-binding meant a -1 >> vote. >> > Please read that email carefully. >> >> I don't think so, but either way, it shows the need for clarity around >> who's votes are binding. I notice the link was edited in the Wiki to >> include all the content and not just link to "Majority Approval" I guess >> that sorts the issue, but does water down the original intention of the >> link. >> > >Thanks for coming to a compromise. Let's move on, please. > >Regards, >Om
