On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Justin Mclean <justinmcl...@me.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > > You interpreted it wrong. That voter thought non-binding meant a -1 > vote. > > Please read that email carefully. > > I don't think so, but either way, it shows the need for clarity around > who's votes are binding. I notice the link was edited in the Wiki to > include all the content and not just link to "Majority Approval" I guess > that sorts the issue, but does water down the original intention of the > link. > Thanks for coming to a compromise. Let's move on, please. Regards, Om
