On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Tom Chiverton <t...@extravision.com> wrote: > ...I'm sure if we got > to the point of voting on something, and there were a large fraction of -1 > (but more +1) we'd still take that as a signal to evaluate whatever it was > more strongly...
That would be great, yes. And even a single -1 might trigger your community health alarms, but with majority approval that doesn't block things and you can move forward while hopefully keeping those alarms in mind. -Bertrand
