(CC-ing Flexicious and Jake@Ardisia) I have a fix ready to be checked in that uses an image and a click event to take the user to a third party demo page. From my FB debug console, I don't see any securitydomain exceptions when I do this. Whereas, with loading a swf, I get a securitydomain error.
Jake, can you send me a link to a jpg image you want to use? I will use the link: http://www.ardisialabs.com/tour-de-flex Sal, do you want to do the same, please? Let's see if this works. Thanks, Om On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Jake Knerr <j...@ardisialabs.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am one of the third-parties, the "Ardisia Component Library". Sorry > about not responding earlier, I just read the thread. > > I am thrilled to be included in the Tour De Flex, so first off thanks for > including this new feature. I tried building the TourDeFlex with the > nightly build from earlier in the thread but I was hit with 100 or so > compile errors with path errors and pointers to non-existent components > like a Spark RichTextEditor so I must be using an incorrect build. > However, earlier in this thread OmPrakash posted screenshots of the problem > and I looked at the nightly binary build so I have an idea of the layout > issues are. > > I hate to cause all this trouble . Perhaps my page in the Tour De Flex > could just be a label and a link? > > - Jake > > > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Jake Knerr <j...@ardisialabs.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am one of the third-parties, the "Ardisia Component Library". Sorry > > about not responding earlier, I just read the thread. > > > > I am thrilled to be included in the Tour De Flex, so first off thanks for > > including this new feature. I tried building the TourDeFlex with the > > nightly build from earlier in the thread but I was hit with 100 or so > > compiling errors with path errors and pointers to non-existent components > > like a Spark RichTextEditor so I must be using an incorrect build. > > However, earlier in this thread OmPrakash posted screenshots of the > problem > > and I looked at the nightly binary build so I have an idea of the layout > > issues are. > > > > I hate to cause all this trouble . Perhaps my page in the Tour De Flex > > could just be a label and a link? > > > > > > > > > > Say something like what I have now, except go ahead and drop the > imagehave > > a single page with a list of third party components arranged in a grid > > format with a short description of each and a link to the demo. This > way, > > it could be compiled into the app with minimal effort and > > > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On 11/7/14, 12:34 AM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > >> > >> >So how do we reach consensus on this in a timely way? If the process > >> >doesn't allow a vote and/or people don't vote it's basically dead in > the > >> >water. I would like to see this released sooner than later and not have > >> >releases hanging for weeks, not everyone is full time on this project > and > >> >increasing the length of the release process stops people from being > able > >> >to be a release manager. If we had stuck to the official recommend > >> >process we probably would of released by now. The previous version of > >> >Tour De Flex had two release candidates and was released in 10 days > from > >> >start of the first RC vote to the final vote result. > >> > >> Sometimes, releases get stuck on hard issues discovered late in the > game. > >> It is clear you want to ship as-is, but I think we should make the > >> third-party content look good. I was hoping the third parties would > have > >> offered their thoughts by now. I’m wondering if they’ve at least tried > >> the nightly build at [1] and saw how their content appears, because > that’s > >> how it will behave when published to flex.a.o. > >> > >> Also, have you investigated the Squiggly issue brought up yesterday [2]? > >> I also get the exception. It could just be a bug in the CI server setup. > >> > >> Both Squiggly and Third Party examples are highlighted in the > >> RELEASE_NOTES and both are not fully operational. > >> > >> > > >> >It's also curious as to why you only decide to bring this content load > >> >strategy up now and state it as a blocker for releasing, rather than > when > >> >we we were discussing adding 3rd party support for it several months > ago. > >> > >> It never crossed my mind until I saw the issue brought up on this > thread. > >> If we had established Jenkins builds sooner, then maybe we would have > >> found it sooner, because it was only when I saw it that I realized what > >> was going on, and only after thinking about it more did it occur to me > >> that we really should get Marshall Plan separation from the third > parties. > >> If we can’t engage them on this sizing/position issue, we probably > don’t > >> want to depend on them staying in sync on SDK versions going forward. > >> > >> -Alex > >> > >> [1] http://s.apache.org/sC4 > >> [2] http://s.apache.org/hqe > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Jake Knerr - Flex Developer > > Ardisia Labs > > www.ardisialabs.com > > > > > > -- > Jake Knerr - Flex Developer > Ardisia Labs > www.ardisialabs.com >
