Hi, > Is that 100 different people or 100 attempts from potentially a smaller > set of people?
It's 100 different people ie unique views in google analytics. > Another option might be to change the apache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml > on dist and just have one step that, instead of the license, tells folks > that the build is broken by SourceForge and to use Ant. Do we really want to waste a users time in having them downloading the installer, install it and then run it only to tell them they need to go somewhere else? I think that would frustrate me just as much as a broken installer. I think it would be better to just remove FlexJS from the installer until we can somehow fix this issue. What do other people think? Thanks, Justin
