Awesome!

On 10/5/14, 12:57 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:

>One more thing:
>
>I¹m pretty sure there were changes done to TLF in develop after I forked
>the code, so this changes will need to be merged in.
>
>On Oct 5, 2014, at 10:53 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I just committed my work on tables to the repository. I committed it to
>>a new branch called tables. There¹s still work to be done before it can
>>be merged with develop. Here¹s a summary of the status:
>> 
>> 1) There are NO unit tests. I have not run any existing test nor have I
>>created any new tests. I have zero experience with tests. I¹ll be happy
>>to do some work on this, but I will need direction.
>> 2) Markup will probably not work. All my testing with the code has been
>>creating elements directly.
>> 3) There are no Operations that currently work correctly with tables,
>>so Undo with tables is a no-no.
>> 4) I have made changes to SelectionManager, and there¹s now a concept
>>of nested TextFlows and nested SelectionManagers/EditManagers. Text in
>>table cells are nested TextFlows rather than children of the main
>>TextFlow.
>> 5) ParagraphElements can now contain more than a single TextBlock.
>>Substantial work has been done to support this.
>> 
>> A quick summery of what features are supported:
>> 
>> 1) While it¹s possible to specify header and footer cells, they are
>>ineffectual.
>> 2) Cells spanning columns work, but ones spanning rows do not.
>> 3) Multiple cells can be selected, but the must be contiguous ranges.
>> 4) It¹s possible to get the selection of cells from the parent
>>EditManager.
>> 5) All basic cell formatting is supported (strokes, fills, inset, etc.)
>> 6) No stroke/fil patterns are supported. If you need alternating fills
>>for example, they must be specified directly.
>> 7) Fixed height and expanding height cells are supported. All cells
>>must have a fixed width.
>> 
>> That¹s more or less what comes to mind right now. I will be committing
>>any fixes to the tables branch from now on. I¹ll try to document as much
>>as I can somewhereŠ ;-)
>> 
>> Harbs
>

Reply via email to