One more thing:

I’m pretty sure there were changes done to TLF in develop after I forked the 
code, so this changes will need to be merged in.

On Oct 5, 2014, at 10:53 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I just committed my work on tables to the repository. I committed it to a new 
> branch called tables. There’s still work to be done before it can be merged 
> with develop. Here’s a summary of the status:
> 
> 1) There are NO unit tests. I have not run any existing test nor have I 
> created any new tests. I have zero experience with tests. I’ll be happy to do 
> some work on this, but I will need direction.
> 2) Markup will probably not work. All my testing with the code has been 
> creating elements directly.
> 3) There are no Operations that currently work correctly with tables, so Undo 
> with tables is a no-no.
> 4) I have made changes to SelectionManager, and there’s now a concept of 
> nested TextFlows and nested SelectionManagers/EditManagers. Text in table 
> cells are nested TextFlows rather than children of the main TextFlow.
> 5) ParagraphElements can now contain more than a single TextBlock. 
> Substantial work has been done to support this.
> 
> A quick summery of what features are supported:
> 
> 1) While it’s possible to specify header and footer cells, they are 
> ineffectual.
> 2) Cells spanning columns work, but ones spanning rows do not.
> 3) Multiple cells can be selected, but the must be contiguous ranges.
> 4) It’s possible to get the selection of cells from the parent EditManager.
> 5) All basic cell formatting is supported (strokes, fills, inset, etc.)
> 6) No stroke/fil patterns are supported. If you need alternating fills for 
> example, they must be specified directly.
> 7) Fixed height and expanding height cells are supported. All cells must have 
> a fixed width.
> 
> That’s more or less what comes to mind right now. I will be committing any 
> fixes to the tables branch from now on. I’ll try to document as much as I can 
> somewhere… ;-)
> 
> Harbs

Reply via email to