On 8/26/14 2:54 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>+1 to Justin's proposal. It makes sense to do things the right way and to >encourage new folks to become Release Managers as the overhead is very low >for TourDeFlex project. I don't believe my proposal is the "wrong way", just another alternative. > >Keep in mind that we may not be able to do this for 3rd party component >developers. Because we want to hotlink to their examples and code >directly, we may not be able to 'build' a release from our side. > >I propose that we create a new thirdparty.xml and allow direct editing of >the file on the site so that 3rd party content will show up immediately >without having to go through a release process. I'm not sure I understand your position. I think you are saying you only want to push a compiled source release to the site, but now I think you are saying that it won't be a pure compilation, that some tweaks will be made. In fact, we already approved one tweak when we added analytics to the landing page. Where are you drawing the line? -Alex
