Ah, thanks for reminding me. Nobody responded with any other comments. I'll wait another day before emailing them.
-Alex On 7/20/14 10:50 AM, "Stephane Beladaci" <adobeflexengin...@gmail.com> wrote: >Hi Everyone > >I'm curious to know what is the outcome regarding that friendly email. For >once that someone is usong a blatant copy of the Flex logo and name, for >commercial purpose, with no disclaimer, I am very surprised that you guys >are not more aggressive especially after all the hard time given Made in >Flex. If you do not do anything in the case it will dilute the brand and >make harder for you to reinforce your intellectual property if this >happens >again. > >Sincerely, >Stephane >On Jun 19, 2014 9:22 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> I'm not sure what "enforce" means. Maybe we need to agree on what we >>want >> to see changed. >> >> -Personally, I'm not in favor of letting him use the blue icon. >> -I am ok with the product name "Flex Presentation" >> -We want the Google Play store Description to start with "Flex( ) >> Presentation", but I'm ok with the not being in the title. (My email >> client is inserting an actual trademark symbol when ever I type capital >>T >> and capital M together. It may not come through when you read it. >> -We want the Apache attribution at the end of the description >> -We want his site to use the symbol after Flex in the description >> -We want his site to have the Apache attribution at the bottom. >> >> Anything else? >> >> >> On 6/19/14 7:19 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >> >> >You said "not enforce a change." I don't agree with that. I do agree >>with >> >your suggested approach method (email first, if no action, then >>consider >> >options). >> > >> >EdB >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Justin Mclean >><jus...@classsoftware.com> >> >wrote: >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> > If a bricks and mortar - or rather: mud brick - store would use a >>blue >> >> > version of the Adobe logo and call itself "the adobe photo shoppe", >> >>would >> >> > that be an infraction on the logo and trademark of Adobe Photoshop? >> >>I'm >> >> > sure Adobe's lawyers would think so. >> >> That certainly would but that not quite the case here. IMO a polite >> >>email >> >> first and then if no action we consider what to do next. >> >> >> >> Justin >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >-- >> >Ix Multimedia Software >> > >> >Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> >3521 VB Utrecht >> > >> >T. 06-51952295 >> >I. www.ixsoftware.nl >> >>
