I'm not sure what "enforce" means. Maybe we need to agree on what we want to see changed.
-Personally, I'm not in favor of letting him use the blue icon. -I am ok with the product name "Flex Presentation" -We want the Google Play store Description to start with "Flex() Presentation", but I'm ok with the not being in the title. (My email client is inserting an actual trademark symbol when ever I type capital T and capital M together. It may not come through when you read it. -We want the Apache attribution at the end of the description -We want his site to use the symbol after Flex in the description -We want his site to have the Apache attribution at the bottom. Anything else? On 6/19/14 7:19 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >You said "not enforce a change." I don't agree with that. I do agree with >your suggested approach method (email first, if no action, then consider >options). > >EdB > > > > >On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> >wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> > If a bricks and mortar - or rather: mud brick - store would use a blue >> > version of the Adobe logo and call itself "the adobe photo shoppe", >>would >> > that be an infraction on the logo and trademark of Adobe Photoshop? >>I'm >> > sure Adobe's lawyers would think so. >> That certainly would but that not quite the case here. IMO a polite >>email >> first and then if no action we consider what to do next. >> >> Justin > > > > >-- >Ix Multimedia Software > >Jan Luykenstraat 27 >3521 VB Utrecht > >T. 06-51952295 >I. www.ixsoftware.nl
