On 7/11/14 11:29 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>I was looking for the answer you gave in the last paragraph. I don't want >to replace the old compiler, I want Falcon(JX) to co-exist. > >Can we adjust the scripts that create FlexJS to make this happen? Do you mean build scripts or install scripts or both? At some point, I think you want the Falcon compiler to be the default compiler for an SDK so that folks get the early warnings and errors about missing functionality without having to run a launch config. That would conflict with Mustella since it currently uses the default compiler. But for an IDE compatible SDK, would those folks really run mustella? We don't include mustella in a package. The IDEs don't currently know about more than one compiler in an SDK. IntelliJ and FDT might change to support that, FB would be much harder to change. For developers working off of the repos, those working copies are not set up for IDEs. I guess folks can pollute their working copy with the Adobe AIR SDK and other downloads and use it in an IDE? Either way, Falcon is in a different repo. If you then have a launch config that launches Falcon, it will try to compile an SDK project, that's how we compile the SDK swcs as part of the Falcon feature tests. But then Falcon isn't the default compiler. Do you just want that launch config as a temporary thing until Falcon is upgraded to handle mustella? -Alex
