Actually this is what I would like to do for the Mavenizer too ... that I am able to reference different compiler artifacts and use the classis as well as the falcon compiler.
Chris -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl] Gesendet: Samstag, 12. Juli 2014 08:29 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: [FlexJS] SDK overlay I was looking for the answer you gave in the last paragraph. I don't want to replace the old compiler, I want Falcon(JX) to co-exist. Can we adjust the scripts that create FlexJS to make this happen? EdB On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 7/11/14 12:39 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > > >Alex, > > > >Is it (currently) possible to take a plain, released SDK and overlay > >FlexJS over that, such that the original SDK will remain fully > >functional - i.e. > >pass Mustella? > I have not tried to pass mustella with Falcon. Since Falcon doesn't > yet have embedded font support, I would expect tons of errors. > > But I have compiled a very large app with Falcon and it compiled and ran. > > I have not tried to shove anything significant through FalconJX though. > > The Overlay is only for IDE integration. If you do not swap out MXMLC > for Falcon, then an SDK will continue to pass Mustella, and you can > run Falcon/FalconJX via a launch config. > > -Alex > > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
