Took longer though :-)

Tom

On 10/07/14 10:42, Carlos Rovira wrote:
> Yeah!, It was even easier when we used an abacus ;)
>
>
> 2014-07-10 11:14 GMT+02:00 Tom Chiverton <t...@extravision.com>:
>
>> It was so much easier with SVN...
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> On 10/07/14 10:02, Jose Barragan wrote:
>>> Hi Erik,
>>>
>>> Nothing is really wrong there, is just for an philosophical criteria
>> based on best practices of git.
>>> Currently, you and rest of apache flex team, maintains your branches
>> updated using a commit merge node from latest commit on develop, isn’t it?.
>> Well, this practice cause a big complexity on tree node and a messy
>> traceability of branch content.
>>> I was proposing you another way, using a combination of git-rebase and
>> git-merge operations, in order to use git-rebase onto develop to maintain
>> your branch updated, and git-merge to apply the complete final change-set
>> on develop when developing is finished.
>>> But, as I told you, it was a simple proposal only, and if you don't feel
>> like to adopt it, just forget it and remove the proposed branch. I did the
>> push to allow you can see the result of the proposed way vs your currently
>> way at same time, on commits tree.
>>> Thanks,
>>> ______________________
>>> Jose Barragan
>>> Senior Software Engineer
>>> Codeoscopic
>>> +34 912 94 80 80
>>> http://www.codeoscopic.com
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10 Jul 2014, at 07:29, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>>>
>>>> José,
>>>>
>>>> I'm confused. What was I doing wrong that made this necessary?
>>>>
>>>> EdB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, July 10, 2014, Jose Barragan <josebarra...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Erik,
>>>>>
>>>>> While I was preparing to reactivate the maven branch of falcon's
>> project,
>>>>> I have taken the opportunity to rebase your new branch "VF2JS", onto
>> the
>>>>> latest develop commit, with the intention that you get the new branch
>> and
>>>>> could continue your develop on it, using “git rebase” to maintain your
>>>>> branch updated until the merge time. If you don’t feel happy with this
>>>>> proposal, feel free to completely remove it, but if you feel
>> confortable
>>>>> with new branch and git practice, we can completely remove the old
>>>>> "current" branch version VS2JS.
>>>>>
>>>>> I was only tried to help, with our git usage on apache flex
>> repositories.
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> ______________________
>>>>> *Jose Barragan*
>>>>> *Senior Software Engineer*
>>>>> *josebarra...@apache.org
>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','josebarra...@apache.org');>*
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>>>
>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>>>
>>>> T. 06-51952295
>>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
>>> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to