Took longer though :-) Tom
On 10/07/14 10:42, Carlos Rovira wrote: > Yeah!, It was even easier when we used an abacus ;) > > > 2014-07-10 11:14 GMT+02:00 Tom Chiverton <t...@extravision.com>: > >> It was so much easier with SVN... >> >> Tom >> >> On 10/07/14 10:02, Jose Barragan wrote: >>> Hi Erik, >>> >>> Nothing is really wrong there, is just for an philosophical criteria >> based on best practices of git. >>> Currently, you and rest of apache flex team, maintains your branches >> updated using a commit merge node from latest commit on develop, isn’t it?. >> Well, this practice cause a big complexity on tree node and a messy >> traceability of branch content. >>> I was proposing you another way, using a combination of git-rebase and >> git-merge operations, in order to use git-rebase onto develop to maintain >> your branch updated, and git-merge to apply the complete final change-set >> on develop when developing is finished. >>> But, as I told you, it was a simple proposal only, and if you don't feel >> like to adopt it, just forget it and remove the proposed branch. I did the >> push to allow you can see the result of the proposed way vs your currently >> way at same time, on commits tree. >>> Thanks, >>> ______________________ >>> Jose Barragan >>> Senior Software Engineer >>> Codeoscopic >>> +34 912 94 80 80 >>> http://www.codeoscopic.com >>> >>> >>> On 10 Jul 2014, at 07:29, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >>> >>>> José, >>>> >>>> I'm confused. What was I doing wrong that made this necessary? >>>> >>>> EdB >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thursday, July 10, 2014, Jose Barragan <josebarra...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>>>> Hi Erik, >>>>> >>>>> While I was preparing to reactivate the maven branch of falcon's >> project, >>>>> I have taken the opportunity to rebase your new branch "VF2JS", onto >> the >>>>> latest develop commit, with the intention that you get the new branch >> and >>>>> could continue your develop on it, using “git rebase” to maintain your >>>>> branch updated until the merge time. If you don’t feel happy with this >>>>> proposal, feel free to completely remove it, but if you feel >> confortable >>>>> with new branch and git practice, we can completely remove the old >>>>> "current" branch version VS2JS. >>>>> >>>>> I was only tried to help, with our git usage on apache flex >> repositories. >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> ______________________ >>>>> *Jose Barragan* >>>>> *Senior Software Engineer* >>>>> *josebarra...@apache.org >>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','josebarra...@apache.org');>* >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ix Multimedia Software >>>> >>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >>>> 3521 VB Utrecht >>>> >>>> T. 06-51952295 >>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl >>> ______________________________________________________________________ >>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. >>> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com >>> ______________________________________________________________________ >>> >> >