Thanks Chris, Regarding your recommendation Chris, follow this link to see it on UDemy: https://curiosity.com/courses/mccullough-and-berglund-on-mastering-git-udemy
______________________ Jose Barragan Senior Software Engineer Codeoscopic +34 912 94 80 80 http://www.codeoscopic.com On 10 Jul 2014, at 11:37, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > Usually there is a tight correlation between such statements and the lack of > GIT knowledge. > Sort of like the amount of the usage of the word "stupid" in scentances where > somebody is talking about Maven ;-) > > And while noone will probably want to go back to Ant as soon as he has really > understood Maven, you will love GIT as soon as you got the hang of it :-) > > I can certainly recommend the Video Tutorial "McCullough and Berglund on > Mastering Git" to get up to speed with all of the new GIT stuff. > > Chris > > ________________________________________ > Von: Tom Chiverton <t...@extravision.com> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Juli 2014 11:14 > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Hi, about my "experimental/VF2JS" branch > > It was so much easier with SVN... > > Tom > > On 10/07/14 10:02, Jose Barragan wrote: >> Hi Erik, >> >> Nothing is really wrong there, is just for an philosophical criteria based >> on best practices of git. >> >> Currently, you and rest of apache flex team, maintains your branches updated >> using a commit merge node from latest commit on develop, isn’t it?. Well, >> this practice cause a big complexity on tree node and a messy traceability >> of branch content. >> >> I was proposing you another way, using a combination of git-rebase and >> git-merge operations, in order to use git-rebase onto develop to maintain >> your branch updated, and git-merge to apply the complete final change-set on >> develop when developing is finished. >> >> But, as I told you, it was a simple proposal only, and if you don't feel >> like to adopt it, just forget it and remove the proposed branch. I did the >> push to allow you can see the result of the proposed way vs your currently >> way at same time, on commits tree. >> >> Thanks, >> ______________________ >> Jose Barragan >> Senior Software Engineer >> Codeoscopic >> +34 912 94 80 80 >> http://www.codeoscopic.com >> >> >> On 10 Jul 2014, at 07:29, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >> >>> José, >>> >>> I'm confused. What was I doing wrong that made this necessary? >>> >>> EdB >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thursday, July 10, 2014, Jose Barragan <josebarra...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Erik, >>>> >>>> While I was preparing to reactivate the maven branch of falcon's project, >>>> I have taken the opportunity to rebase your new branch "VF2JS", onto the >>>> latest develop commit, with the intention that you get the new branch and >>>> could continue your develop on it, using “git rebase” to maintain your >>>> branch updated until the merge time. If you don’t feel happy with this >>>> proposal, feel free to completely remove it, but if you feel confortable >>>> with new branch and git practice, we can completely remove the old >>>> "current" branch version VS2JS. >>>> >>>> I was only tried to help, with our git usage on apache flex repositories. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> ______________________ >>>> *Jose Barragan* >>>> *Senior Software Engineer* >>>> *josebarra...@apache.org >>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','josebarra...@apache.org');>* >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ix Multimedia Software >>> >>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >>> 3521 VB Utrecht >>> >>> T. 06-51952295 >>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl >> ______________________________________________________________________ >> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. >> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com >> ______________________________________________________________________ >> >
