I'm Sorry, this post must be posted at rc5 thread ______________________ Jose Barragan Senior Software Engineer Codeoscopic +34 912 94 80 80 http://www.codeoscopic.com
On 30 Jun 2014, at 12:49, Jose Barragan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, testing the new Installer I got an exception when tried to install the > 4.13.0 RC2 FDK but doesn’t happened when installing 4.12.1 ... > > Process: Apache Flex SDK Installer [5570] > Path: /Applications/Apache Flex/Apache Flex SDK > Installer.app/Contents/MacOS/Apache Flex SDK Installer > Identifier: org.apache.flex.installapacheflex > Version: 3.1.0 (???) > Code Type: X86 (Native) > Parent Process: launchd [277] > Responsible: Apache Flex SDK Installer [5570] > User ID: 501 > > Date/Time: 2014-06-30 12:43:37.045 +0200 > OS Version: Mac OS X 10.9.3 (13D65) > Report Version: 11 > Anonymous UUID: 74662061-F9E9-E13F-709F-F0DD028953BA > > > Crashed Thread: 9 com.apple.NSURLConnectionLoader > > Exception Type: EXC_CRASH (SIGABRT) > Exception Codes: 0x0000000000000000, 0x0000000000000000 > > Application Specific Information: > terminating with uncaught exception of type Security::UnixError: UNIX error > exception > abort() called > > > > anybody knows something about that? > > ______________________ > Jose Barragan > Senior Software Engineer > Codeoscopic > +34 912 94 80 80 > http://www.codeoscopic.com > > On 30 Jun 2014, at 09:04, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Would the vote be consensus? If so, it is guaranteed to lose. >> If the vote is majority and loses, does that prevent me from using the >> script? Or sharing with others via some other place other than the repo? >> >> I guess I don't see how we can legislate against individuals using scripts. >> But I do agree that we don't want to keep arguing this topic. >> >> -Alex >> ________________________________________ >> From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala >> [[email protected]] >> Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 11:08 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.1 - RC3 >> >> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Again, this script does not decide on the correctness of the >>> LICENSE/NOTICE, so every time some one or the same person runs it, there is >>> the same chance they will catch an error as if they had typed the >>> command-line commands themselves. The script does not vote for you, it is >>> only intended to increase your efficiency and accuracy in deciding how to >>> vote. And yes, nobody has to use it. >>> >>> >> Let us vote on this verification scripts and formalize it, please. We >> don't want to argue this point during every RC. >> >> Thanks, >> Om >> >> >>> -Alex >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: Justin Mclean [[email protected]] >>> Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 5:39 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.1 - RC3 >>> >>> HI, >>> >>>> The approval scripts attempt to get you to vote with less hassle. >>> >>> Again to make clear a script is in no way a replacement for voting. Don't >>> get me wrong it's very useful as a basic check and hopefully that will mean >>> people will vote more. But put it this way, running the script 1000 times >>> on a RC by one person or once by 1000 people gives the same results. Would >>> the second really be worth 1000 +1 votes? Do we really think that a script >>> == due diligence? >
