>You should get an arg count mismatch. By changing the (!hasFieldName) test on
>Sort.as line 413 I got the expected result ("Find criteria must contain all
>sort fields")
Thanks. I think there may have been a bad merge on my part too as it seems the
logic that was checked in is also missing another condition. Will try to get
this resolved today.
My concern on the change above is only that a custom sort function could be on
use a label function or something other than a single field, so we need to
ensure that we don't exclusively use the existence of the fields as an
indicator. The original bug was also that rows were being inserted in the wrong
place when using a custom sort function as it was using the field to determine
where, not the function.
Mike
