>Mike, your thoughts on the logic? The test sets up two SortFields and a >compare function on the Sort (not the SortFields) then calls findItem. The first SortField's field name is a non-existent field. I think the old logic would see if the field existed in the data item. The new logic seems to assume the fieldName exists as long as there is no SortField compare function and skips the check if the field exists in the data.
Let me setup and replicate this scenario and mine locally and see what I can do. Mike
