On 3/11/14 9:12 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi, > >> PlayerGlobal.swc was the only difference? >Yes that was the only difference. All other files were identical in both >and neither instal had an extra or missing file. > >> Whether it is cached or not is in the hands of the installer.xml in the >> 4.12.0 release. We could change that for 4.13. >So it's in the config file? No, it is in the installer.xml. We'd have to change the 4.12 release to change whether this file gets cached or not. > >I suggest we change it now so it does have security concerns and people >may not realise that they are not getting the latest player global. I thought byte code from playerglobal did not actually get linked into any SWF. Actually, that's sort of important from a dependencies point of view. What are the other differences, if any, between these playerglobals? -Alex
