Hi,
@Alex, good news :-)
@Om, Not sure I follow you, could please review what I was describing and tell
me if it was what you thought ? (I hope that will be printed correctly)
BlazeDSLCDSGraniteDSFramework integrationSpring(1)xxEJB 3
xCDI
xJPA engine supportHibernate(2)xxEclipseLink
xOpenJPA
xDataNucleus
xMessaging (real-time)Blocking I/O http long-pollingxxxBlocking I/O http
streamingxx
Non-blocking I/O http long-polling(3)xxNon-blocking I/O http streaming(3)x
RTMP
x
WebSocket
xUDP
xData managementBean validation
xBig numbers
xCode generation
xxData paging
xxData synchonization / conflict resolution
xxDisconnected mode
xplannedOthersMonitoring
x
Load testing tools(4)(4)(4)PDF generation
x
LicensingOpen sourcex
xCommercial
xx
1 - Using the project Spring-Flex2 - Partial support in Spring-Flex or
dpHibernate3 - Possible with some third party extensions4 - Supported by
NeoLoad, HP LoadRunner, IBM Rational Performance Tester
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 09:29:56 -0800
> Subject: Re: Flex and server technology
> From: bigosma...@gmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> On Feb 16, 2014 3:25 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a comparative feature table for BlazeDS / LCDS / GraniteDS, given
> some people are asking about it at time, do you think it is something that
> could fit on our wiki ?
>
> -1
>
> If it were just a listing instead of a comparison, that would be fine.
>
> Given that we will be controlling BlazeDS as part of Apache Flex, it may
> not be fair to GraniteDS or LCDS. We should avoid even the appearance of
> favoritism.
>
> It might be better to put this up on your personal blog.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Frédéric THOMAS
> >
