Hi, > That brings up a very interesting point. I am not sure how much work this is > but it would be extremely helpful to developers looking at the source code to > have methods with compiler-based mixins (or whatever you want to call them) be > indicated as such in framework code comments, so we don't have do this sort of > "mystery meat" guesswork whilst debugging.
Done for that method - any other methods need the same treatment? Thanks, Justin
