Exactly. Usually CI is just for checking. But until the Installer can create a working FlexJS SDK, the people wanting to play with it, like the nice folks from FDK, mostly have to rely on the nightly builds. The certainly can build an SDK themselves, but I don't think they need to waste their time having to do that over and over again. If we want to maintain our momentum, this seems very important to me. Living without the flex-sdk builds for a while isn't all that bad in itself, as the Mustella VM catches most of what they do and much more...
EdB On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > Hi, > >> Our nr. 1 priority now, IMHO, must be to have reliable nightly builds >> in place, so any contributors/third parties can get the Flex and >> FlexJS SDKs and have the latest and greatest. > > For development and testing purposes only of course :-) If it's not an > officially voted on release then that's all it can be used for. > > Have a working CI system that run after you check something in IMO is > priority no 1 and the nightly build is just a nice little bonus that make > life easier for a few folk. It's not actually required as anyone can build > the software (with a little bit of effort) from the repo. > > Thanks, > Justin -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
