It's been so long since I've seen that, that I don't completely remember. I believe it could be a Java class path issue. That the compiler is picking up an different version of MapMaker than expected.
-Alex On 10/31/13 9:58 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >And I killed it again... Now I'm getting this (vaguely familiar) error: > >Using Falcon codebase: >/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/git/flex-falcon/compiler.jx/bin/../../com >piler >Using Flex SDK: /Users/erik/Desktop/OverlayedSDK >Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to >access method >com.google.common.collect.MapMaker.makeComputingMap(Lcom/google/common/bas >e/Function;)Ljava/util/concurrent/ConcurrentMap; >from class org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.projects.CompilerProject >at >org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.projects.CompilerProject.<init>(Compiler >Project.java:114) >at >org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.projects.ASProject.<init>(ASProject.java >:71) >at >org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.projects.FlexProject.<init>(FlexProject. >java:109) >at >org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.projects.FlexProject.<init>(FlexProject. >java:129) >at >org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.projects.FlexJSProject.<init>(FlexJSProj >ect.java:48) >at org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLJSC.<init>(MXMLJSC.java:198) >at org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLJSC.main(MXMLJSC.java:171) > >Remind me, how do I fix this? > >EdB > > > >On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >> Basically, I'm complaining it's getting too hard to develop for this, >> but I guess that's to be expected at this stage. >> >> It's up and running now. >> >> EdB >> >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>> Not sure what you're asking. There isn't any Adobe code in there. The >>> zip contains binaries so it can't go in the repo. The sh/bat files in >>>the >>> zip are not in the repo because I keep hoping they will go away someday >>> and be replaced by an installer. >>> >>> -Alex >>> >>> On 10/31/13 6:30 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >>> >>>>Ok... is that proprietary code, or just not in the repo yet? >>>> >>>>EdB >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>>>> By using the FlexJSOverlay.zip on my people.a.o folder. Instructions >>>>>are >>>>> available at >>>>> >>>>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Using+FlexJS+with+Ado >>>>>be+ >>>>>Fl >>>>> ash+Builder >>>>> >>>>> -Alex >>>>> >>>>> On 10/31/13 6:20 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>And how does one 'overlay' an SDK? >>>>>> >>>>>>EdB >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>>>>>> I've been testing against DataBindingTest whose sources are up on >>>>>>>my >>>>>>> people.a.o folder, so maybe this doesn't build anymore, but the >>>>>>>console >>>>>>> output looks like you are referencing a full Apache Flex SDK >>>>>>>instead >>>>>>>of >>>>>>> one that is overlaid, which might cause the compiler to find CSS >>>>>>>files >>>>>>>in >>>>>>> a whole bunch of SWCs that we don't currently handle. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> IOW, you can't just add FlexJSUI.swc to an existing SDK, it has to >>>>>>>be >>>>>>> "overlaid" which neuters some things in an Apache Flex SDK. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Alex >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 10/31/13 5:29 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I'm busy building support for the "is" and "as" operators into >>>>>>>>FlexJS. >>>>>>>>Now, first I thought I'd try to compile the FlexJSTest_again >>>>>>>>example. >>>>>>>>To my suprise, I get an error: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>CSS codegen problem. Reason: 'Unable to find compilation unit for >>>>>>>>Embed(source="Assets.swf",symbol="mx.skins.cursor.BusyCursor")' >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>The error seems to originate from FalconJx, it is thrown in >>>>>>>>JSCSSCompilationSession.java... Now, my sources are fresh, I've >>>>>>>>rebuild the SDK (super-clean main), all compiler projects (wipe >>>>>>>>main) >>>>>>>>and the FlexUI.swc. Am I missing something (command line arg) or is >>>>>>>>there some source not yet committed or something more obvious I'm >>>>>>>>overlooking? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>These are my arguments: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>+env.PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME=/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/dependencie >>>>>>>>s/P >>>>>>>>la >>>>>>>>ye >>>>>>>>rGlobal/player >>>>>>>>+playerglobal.version=11.1 >>>>>>>>-load-config="/Applications/Adobe Flash Builder >>>>>>>>4.7/sdks/4.10.0/frameworks/flex-config.xml" >>>>>>>>-library-path+=/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/git/flex-asjs/frame >>>>>>>>wor >>>>>>>>ks >>>>>>>>/a >>>>>>>>s/libs/FlexJSUI.swc >>>>>>>>-js-output-type=FLEXJS >>>>>>>>-closure-lib=/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/dependencies/GoogleCl >>>>>>>>osu >>>>>>>>re >>>>>>>>/l >>>>>>>>ibrary >>>>>>>>-sdk-js-lib=/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/git/flex-asjs/framewor >>>>>>>>ks/ >>>>>>>>js >>>>>>>>/F >>>>>>>>lexJS/src >>>>>>>>/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/git/flex-asjs/examples/FlexJSTest_ >>>>>>>>aga >>>>>>>>in >>>>>>>>/s >>>>>>>>rc/FlexJSTest_again.mxml >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>EdB >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> >>>>>>>>wrote: >>>>>>>>> I'll have a look at it today. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> EdB >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, October 30, 2013, Peter Ent wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Erik. Interesting read. FlexJS uses a lot of interfaces >>>>>>>>>>so >>>>>>>>>>we'll >>>>>>>>>> have to find a reasonable solution for this. We've managed to >>>>>>>>>>avoid >>>>>>>>>>the >>>>>>>>>> situation in JavaScript but it is coming up quickly. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> --peter >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 10/30/13 3:10 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >Some guidance can be found here [1] and here [2]. >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >EdB >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >1: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>http://blogs.adobe.com/bparadie/2011/11/26/classes-inheritance-i >>>>>>>>>>>nte >>>>>>>>>>>rf >>>>>>>>>>>ac >>>>>>>>>>>es- >>>>>>>>>> >packages-and-namespaces/ >>>>>>>>>> >2: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Simulating+AS3+ >>>>>>>>>>>lan >>>>>>>>>>>gu >>>>>>>>>>>ag >>>>>>>>>>>e+f >>>>>>>>>> >eatures+in+JavaScript+using+AMD+and+ES5 >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Erik de Bruin >>>>>>>>>><e...@ixsoftware.nl> >>>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >> "instanceof" doesn't check if an interface is implemented, >>>>>>>>>>neither >>>>>>>>>>in >>>>>>>>>> >> Flex nor using Closure inheritance in JavaScript. What we >>>>>>>>>>need >>>>>>>>>>for >>>>>>>>>> >> runtime checking of interface implementation is an global >>>>>>>>>>"is" >>>>>>>>>> >> function... I think I taught FalconJx to translate "ClassA is >>>>>>>>>>ClassB" >>>>>>>>>> >> as "is(ClassA, ClassB)". All we need to do now is to >>>>>>>>>>implement a >>>>>>>>>> >> global "is()" function and somehow teach the compiler to keep >>>>>>>>>>track >>>>>>>>>>of >>>>>>>>>> >> which classes implement which interfaces - all the way up the >>>>>>>>>>chain >>>>>>>>>> >> and sideways (interfaces can implement interfaces). >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> EdB >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Alex Harui >>>>>>>>>><aha...@adobe.com> >>>>>>>>>>wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>> Reviving this thread... >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> Peter says he wants to test to see if an object implements >>>>>>>>>>an >>>>>>>>>> >>>interface at >>>>>>>>>> >>> runtime. What mechanism do we want to use? >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> I don't think we need to make instanceof work, just have >>>>>>>>>>some >>>>>>>>>>test >>>>>>>>>>to >>>>>>>>>> >>>call. >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> -Alex >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> On 7/30/13 12:46 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> >>>>>>>>>>wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>When using interfaces for type checking, there are two >>>>>>>>>>'kinds': >>>>>>>>>>at >>>>>>>>>> >>>>compilation and at runtime. >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>The @interface and @implements annotations are for compile >>>>>>>>>>time >>>>>>>>>> >>>>checking. >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>For runtime checking comes in two flavours: 'instanceof' and >>>>>>>>>>'is'. >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>Our method of setting up inheritance (goog.inherits) >>>>>>>>>>maintains >>>>>>>>>>the >>>>>>>>>> >>>>inheritance chain, so 'instanceof' works out of the box. >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>The work starts with 'is'. We want to story the 'extends' >>>>>>>>>>and >>>>>>>>>> >>>>'implements' metadata from AS in the JS classes and create a >>>>>>>>>>method to >>>>>>>>>> >>>>test against that metadata set. I have a pretty good idea on >>>>>>>>>>how >>>>>>>>>>to >>>>>>>>>> >>>>implement such a beast, but it will require some (ha!) >>>>>>>>>>tinkering >>>>>>>>>>with >>>>>>>>>> >>>>the FlexJS JS framework and FalconJx. That will take some >>>>>>>>>>time... >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>EdB >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 9:17 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala >>>>>>>>>> >>>><bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Alex Harui >>>>>>>>>><aha...@adobe.com> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> I think FalconJS was going to generate something like: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> if (child != undefined && >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> child.$implements["org.apache.flex.core.IChrome"]) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Not sure what it was going to do for classes, maybe chase >>>>>>>>>>the >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>prototype >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> chain? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> The other thing that occurred to me about $implements or >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>child.is(IChrome) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> is that all objects must then have these properties or >>>>>>>>>>functions >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>where >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>the >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> global function >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >>>>>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> T. 06-51952295 >>>>>>>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>-- >>>>>>>>Ix Multimedia Software >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Jan Luykenstraat 27 >>>>>>>>3521 VB Utrecht >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>T. 06-51952295 >>>>>>>>I. www.ixsoftware.nl >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>-- >>>>>>Ix Multimedia Software >>>>>> >>>>>>Jan Luykenstraat 27 >>>>>>3521 VB Utrecht >>>>>> >>>>>>T. 06-51952295 >>>>>>I. www.ixsoftware.nl >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>-- >>>>Ix Multimedia Software >>>> >>>>Jan Luykenstraat 27 >>>>3521 VB Utrecht >>>> >>>>T. 06-51952295 >>>>I. www.ixsoftware.nl >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Ix Multimedia Software >> >> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> 3521 VB Utrecht >> >> T. 06-51952295 >> I. www.ixsoftware.nl > > > >-- >Ix Multimedia Software > >Jan Luykenstraat 27 >3521 VB Utrecht > >T. 06-51952295 >I. www.ixsoftware.nl
