Ok... is that proprietary code, or just not in the repo yet? EdB
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > By using the FlexJSOverlay.zip on my people.a.o folder. Instructions are > available at > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Using+FlexJS+with+Adobe+Fl > ash+Builder > > -Alex > > On 10/31/13 6:20 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > >>And how does one 'overlay' an SDK? >> >>EdB >> >> >> >>On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>> I've been testing against DataBindingTest whose sources are up on my >>> people.a.o folder, so maybe this doesn't build anymore, but the console >>> output looks like you are referencing a full Apache Flex SDK instead of >>> one that is overlaid, which might cause the compiler to find CSS files >>>in >>> a whole bunch of SWCs that we don't currently handle. >>> >>> IOW, you can't just add FlexJSUI.swc to an existing SDK, it has to be >>> "overlaid" which neuters some things in an Apache Flex SDK. >>> >>> -Alex >>> >>> On 10/31/13 5:29 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >>> >>>>Hi, >>>> >>>>I'm busy building support for the "is" and "as" operators into FlexJS. >>>>Now, first I thought I'd try to compile the FlexJSTest_again example. >>>>To my suprise, I get an error: >>>> >>>>CSS codegen problem. Reason: 'Unable to find compilation unit for >>>>Embed(source="Assets.swf",symbol="mx.skins.cursor.BusyCursor")' >>>> >>>>The error seems to originate from FalconJx, it is thrown in >>>>JSCSSCompilationSession.java... Now, my sources are fresh, I've >>>>rebuild the SDK (super-clean main), all compiler projects (wipe main) >>>>and the FlexUI.swc. Am I missing something (command line arg) or is >>>>there some source not yet committed or something more obvious I'm >>>>overlooking? >>>> >>>>These are my arguments: >>>> >>>>+env.PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME=/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/dependencies/Pla >>>>ye >>>>rGlobal/player >>>>+playerglobal.version=11.1 >>>>-load-config="/Applications/Adobe Flash Builder >>>>4.7/sdks/4.10.0/frameworks/flex-config.xml" >>>>-library-path+=/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/git/flex-asjs/frameworks >>>>/a >>>>s/libs/FlexJSUI.swc >>>>-js-output-type=FLEXJS >>>>-closure-lib=/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/dependencies/GoogleClosure >>>>/l >>>>ibrary >>>>-sdk-js-lib=/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/git/flex-asjs/frameworks/js >>>>/F >>>>lexJS/src >>>>/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/git/flex-asjs/examples/FlexJSTest_again >>>>/s >>>>rc/FlexJSTest_again.mxml >>>> >>>>EdB >>>> >>>> >>>>On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> >>>>wrote: >>>>> I'll have a look at it today. >>>>> >>>>> EdB >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wednesday, October 30, 2013, Peter Ent wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, Erik. Interesting read. FlexJS uses a lot of interfaces so >>>>>>we'll >>>>>> have to find a reasonable solution for this. We've managed to avoid >>>>>>the >>>>>> situation in JavaScript but it is coming up quickly. >>>>>> >>>>>> --peter >>>>>> >>>>>> On 10/30/13 3:10 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >Some guidance can be found here [1] and here [2]. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >EdB >>>>>> > >>>>>> >1: >>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>>>http://blogs.adobe.com/bparadie/2011/11/26/classes-inheritance-interf >>>>>>>ac >>>>>>>es- >>>>>> >packages-and-namespaces/ >>>>>> >2: >>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Simulating+AS3+langu >>>>>>>ag >>>>>>>e+f >>>>>> >eatures+in+JavaScript+using+AMD+and+ES5 >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> >> "instanceof" doesn't check if an interface is implemented, neither >>>>>>in >>>>>> >> Flex nor using Closure inheritance in JavaScript. What we need for >>>>>> >> runtime checking of interface implementation is an global "is" >>>>>> >> function... I think I taught FalconJx to translate "ClassA is >>>>>>ClassB" >>>>>> >> as "is(ClassA, ClassB)". All we need to do now is to implement a >>>>>> >> global "is()" function and somehow teach the compiler to keep >>>>>>track >>>>>>of >>>>>> >> which classes implement which interfaces - all the way up the >>>>>>chain >>>>>> >> and sideways (interfaces can implement interfaces). >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> EdB >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> >>>>>>wrote: >>>>>> >>> Reviving this thread... >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Peter says he wants to test to see if an object implements an >>>>>> >>>interface at >>>>>> >>> runtime. What mechanism do we want to use? >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> I don't think we need to make instanceof work, just have some >>>>>>test >>>>>>to >>>>>> >>>call. >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> -Alex >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> On 7/30/13 12:46 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>>>When using interfaces for type checking, there are two 'kinds': >>>>>>at >>>>>> >>>>compilation and at runtime. >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>>The @interface and @implements annotations are for compile time >>>>>> >>>>checking. >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>>For runtime checking comes in two flavours: 'instanceof' and >>>>>>'is'. >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>>Our method of setting up inheritance (goog.inherits) maintains >>>>>>the >>>>>> >>>>inheritance chain, so 'instanceof' works out of the box. >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>>The work starts with 'is'. We want to story the 'extends' and >>>>>> >>>>'implements' metadata from AS in the JS classes and create a >>>>>>method to >>>>>> >>>>test against that metadata set. I have a pretty good idea on how >>>>>>to >>>>>> >>>>implement such a beast, but it will require some (ha!) tinkering >>>>>>with >>>>>> >>>>the FlexJS JS framework and FalconJx. That will take some time... >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>>EdB >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>>On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 9:17 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala >>>>>> >>>><bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> >>>>>> >>>>>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I think FalconJS was going to generate something like: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> if (child != undefined && >>>>>> >>>>>> child.$implements["org.apache.flex.core.IChrome"]) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Not sure what it was going to do for classes, maybe chase the >>>>>> >>>>>>prototype >>>>>> >>>>>> chain? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The other thing that occurred to me about $implements or >>>>>> >>>>>>child.is(IChrome) >>>>>> >>>>>> is that all objects must then have these properties or >>>>>>functions >>>>>> >>>>>>where >>>>>> >>>>>>the >>>>>> >>>>>> global function >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Ix Multimedia Software >>>>> >>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht >>>>> >>>>> T. 06-51952295 >>>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>-- >>>>Ix Multimedia Software >>>> >>>>Jan Luykenstraat 27 >>>>3521 VB Utrecht >>>> >>>>T. 06-51952295 >>>>I. www.ixsoftware.nl >>> >> >> >> >>-- >>Ix Multimedia Software >> >>Jan Luykenstraat 27 >>3521 VB Utrecht >> >>T. 06-51952295 >>I. www.ixsoftware.nl > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
